Re: a note about the scenarios
Fred Templin <osprey67@yahoo.com> Sat, 25 September 2004 02:25 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA11288; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:25:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CB2Me-00020M-8x; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:32:44 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CB2Ad-00039V-Aa; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:20:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CB28R-0002js-4M for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:18:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA10811 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web80508.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.79.78]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CB2FW-0001rC-Nr for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:25:24 -0400
Message-ID: <20040925021729.16144.qmail@web80508.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.197.18.101] by web80508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:17:29 PDT
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:17:29 -0700
From: Fred Templin <osprey67@yahoo.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2B581B61B043D598B8600A2A@scan.jck.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Subject: Re: a note about the scenarios
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1512824611=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote: > Suppose that, as a result, > we end up with no meetings for six months or a year, no > organized support for the IESG, and lots of us scrambling around > to try to maintain mailing lists and archives on a volunteer > basis. Would the IETF pull through? Maybe. Or maybe not? In which case, I think the question could also be asked as to whether anyone (other than ourselves, of course) would *miss* us after we're gone... Maybe I'm wrong, but I get the sense that the general populous has been and is continuing to get snowed under with way too much verbiage on this subject to derive any kind of an informed opinion. Any ideas on how it can all be distilled into a paragraph or two? Thanks - Fred osprey67@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- a note about the scenarios John Loughney
- Re: a note about the scenarios Tim Chown
- Re: a note about the scenarios John C Klensin
- Re: a note about the scenarios Joe Touch
- Re: a note about the scenarios Fred Templin
- Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scena… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: a note about the scenarios Tim Chown