Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 06 September 2013 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB8E11E80E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2p7X-R3iQOY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B1E21F8F3C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6CB20189; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:34:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 81E5E63AF0; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:25:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAB463848; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:25:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
In-Reply-To: <522949C2.8010206@gmail.com>
References: <5F053C0B-4678-4680-A8BF-62FF282ADDCE@softarmor.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <5C7FECAB-8A22-4AF1-B023-456458E1B288@nominum.com> <522949C2.8010206@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:47 -0400
Message-ID: <3718.1378488347@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:25:51 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> I think we all knew NSA was collecting the data.  Why didn't we do
    >> something about it sooner?  Wasn't it an emergency when the PATRIOT
    >> act was passed?  We certainly thought it was an emergency back in the
    >> days of Skipjack, but then they convinced us we'd won.  Turns out they
    >> just went around us.

    > Tell me what the IETF could be doing that it isn't already doing.

1) We could be telling the public about the protocols that we designed 10, 15,
   and even 20 years ago. Some of which even have rather widespread
   implementation, but seem to have zero use.
   (S/MIME is in every copy of Outlook and Thunderbird, AFAIK)

What would the spam situation be like if 90% of emails were regularly
signed back in 1999?  Yes, and DKIM can sign message bodies now too.
We should be telling people about it.

2) Use this stuff ourselves!!!!

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works