Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 27 November 2012 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEA321F86B5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFNAol9Giakt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7339221F867C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c13so12415690ieb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/caRyRadmEIb63Z/ZG9K3ULhRar2S40LKBi0QOThbDg=; b=w0bbjw3NZ8kaow3Fgxv9DOCDGHDvjyTFvCZ/g4MtzHvtfYg5JBPOQXRzp2UUnU6/47 FqCK/0SZLdUvrc5M8SJtSa3pCaTje8pAAJ2yhgp1eAdKLzWhnmpU+yOlPzrcSIYYk3E5 TvmDaTFs9Tx9fUcurdfN2R+5+5k2GiC86/lG92RRVFf1+VaHAtNkGsCnCBigrv44iXGQ BiGpNbagz+rWuL41M6jSx2jPX4PGjIAr7axe24CLsZuc7o5CudK3fm9hFn/WPD95Mtvc 3TiV8Cbt9MvnF6SN7NFkv6A6UiTOSWXLEfExaBSykr+tt53QKWXoDMIegmjXZVJMT0mQ VSVg==
Received: by 10.50.171.101 with SMTP id at5mr16739967igc.60.1354045301021; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.241.232] ([205.234.44.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg2sm2293256igc.3.2012.11.27.11.41.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50B51774.6070607@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:41:40 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:41:42 -0000

I think the core issue is whether or not there's been adequate
review, and it seems to me to be appropriate to request volunteers
from wg participants to review documents before moving them along.

Melinda