Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 22 November 2013 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059631AE1EE; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivqJg9sZ6up9; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B671AE3B6; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hu19so1060875vcb.14 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9ABXfYL/0Fj+EpKEveBNd+dWWVV3H6Y0G3RNQiE10Pw=; b=qD/kFSjGiqEfgV2UMyqzdBMnR+GzP9eWhPro8qbvkxru+QTl2YkJr8j6iiUVKu5KMv tXiiaCtDWSufW/OrV0fHqKbU1GricyxPoD1aIbRhuE0j8wnRw5L6bW8ndZ0fQ1xnOzV6 OhB5MELWyjprJAq/jlXWADxyE3/tzyDxGIu4K1tj7qEv0047zfVLV8Sj5Qp3yjATuwR6 aLalT0n883u2yeAAIBaMozxqzB/Ah8yO+FLKXz2pccmh8jmeKtZO8+1edMmwiOklIyEO h9MOYysGOJXIE14Z+Zh4UKui+WgRU+p6GykFUvyfcVdrNKzRYqVHRXfZqL4+pFpPsSnk ZDEg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.58.1 with SMTP id e1mr12414524vch.0.1385141805189; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.170.71 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:36:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131122073831.0ca96760@resistor.net>
References: <20131002145238.78084.qmail@joyce.lan> <524D846A.6030905@tana.it> <CAC4RtVBb9FVtmjK4X5hCQpMorHnjmyJLU1sYbNh==iBh8SqztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCjD352oBmPiwmwqPgZun6O9PZRDYyJkcyzwAEWTXUnpw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131122073831.0ca96760@resistor.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:36:45 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HDEneYq9qFs7HOStbPf2YgPdryI
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVA6yZ3w6QAxOwegRBYmmPhugGDKiJ+k1x=UobZkLuFcOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:36:56 -0000

> Section 5 of RFC 5617 created some namespaces [1] in the IANA registry.
> These namespaces require IETF Review.  There is an easy way for the IESG to
> perform the registry clean-up.    The easy way might end up being
> problematic.

I'm not sure I understand the question or the problem.  We normally
leave registries and registered entries alone.  What sort of cleanup
are you looking for?

We could put a notation in the registry that says it's historic, but
anyone looking at the registry's reference document will see that
anyway.

Barry