Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 February 2009 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0633A6D0E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xut0jDrxZ0Bw for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F286B3A6D08 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so482190rvb.49 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ek+nIt6vkTjpUJNsSgoP4VYZQ9WQjtITcMOxEFdG7FA=; b=XjMw8YmX7qLoj+aBItd9UWMqp4XqYdrHgVPi+qMU4kKwtg8zEJ6n0lUmEL0FpeaKen jaf0JbkuIDoTsC13AsHo57Q+MbIZXpDdK64zcMVnwmjM3NyjLYeCs4GxTdmYQcrRoxk4 fZqdOKW10WzLmwagQ9sLGCZ0Vbq80cGRtyUn8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UsLVb++08cd1xVYgW9+/3lJYnaHFPlUtFpifRf+m6MX9QH1LD/UpG9p3c795wNIY+L pc/VI7JO0/DYe8C6o6yPI/+Gbvd8WXhr3pskU9lWgcOICIs9NoOFhFQI5FYk4u5m7AVB 8NuKZitU1ZyPShFaQAs/Sj5X8g6cTET0W7RZs=
Received: by 10.141.29.21 with SMTP id g21mr870908rvj.44.1234490211897; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f42sm630577rvb.3.2009.02.12.17.56.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4994D366.5010206@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:56:54 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
References: <20090213001531.2CFE46BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20090213001531.2CFE46BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:56:47 -0000

On 2009-02-13 13:15, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>     > From: Clint Chaplin <clint.chaplin@gmail.com>
> 
>     > I wouldn't create two places to send comments and attempt to segregate
>     > who can post to which group. However, creating an ietf-comment@ietf.org
>     > email list and asking >all< last call comments to be sent to that
> 
> That also works for me.

I suppose it's better than sending them to this List of Last Resort
as we recommend today. But it's really important that the Subject
contains the draft name. Otherwise, sorting becomes a nightmare.

The radical alternative is of course a web-based method which ensures
that comments are logged and stored per-document, rather than arriving
as random email. That's also much harder to mail bomb.

   Brian