Re: License File for Open Source Repositories

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Sun, 25 December 2016 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3715129731; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20TbgylEdWjL; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60431129721; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id t184so174597528qkd.0; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LY0jASLJ+G7fEgc2s2Q5OWeOtIMa1ywRo2Dbh+Qii9E=; b=PF6AiPYITF7haFMrQ1CJeiDlcNRrI8N3DBZYt3BsnKVtURvDULKo0OUG53i5rIz9bV Xe6qPbVXnTHUsX+sEtzJMlzhrQH5KLUakgMG3lplACKSQCHzvRjPuzBmq7ATZ8eWFIrb 5a9ZdgdggYiWpel6YMe3CG6pk7ypyFXN5Bs0yGZofz7WbzxA+M+Glp4Jru0ila4p0Luj MUj+dXrYRzaXBu7N+v9bRJZbgYC0ouhJMPGUjfnnjI1sseuU+kGV3GP+RiCmfLKOBDyD Db88Ce1amb7xU/5H1hlcdFSwtLHVM2w1gMVdLJLU7q+NHsQoR0NHcvg9sW3xrXmYwGEe FuQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LY0jASLJ+G7fEgc2s2Q5OWeOtIMa1ywRo2Dbh+Qii9E=; b=HuoaDSVPEkpna4IuxNadYuIX9HOMF0JlSGaV9m0gI21EficvSptqnc+hc2syWlS3o9 +sYNm5icjZ7li7uTATO+fD5MxkOSs/RaESNbLoEShZHV8Mr3BEnc0XOZZTmMj8I7HVCK 9/0x9Ay6d+78Zfl+PA6qxbTiTpY0JkKtIzwuSGfiJKzX0Xh8GAR3gdftexwz1+I/8PuV Bzi8eRryL00tBEVDdRgII1P1842HwIecahDBHIvicgyIy3BR8jAIVOJzj2FgDtUFkg8/ aCXhFgi7G6V+tlLsAdJvc7fHmGXXyKQ/hL3znt/5dn/E86W0YSyAOtHSdMTB8HnLDLo1 PIQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJvHDemn+AGyUnAZy72sewF6qyWcrAVZp6P5jGIh0BfODMvFQdALmOgbYHFGbX6SSRLzqRXcLfjVUPE9w==
X-Received: by 10.55.9.15 with SMTP id 15mr21322993qkj.118.1482631107438; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <aea79243-ddb0-efda-5f1e-eeff016b4c5e@bogus.com>
References: <148250741312.16852.14743474459827703109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA93jw7r44sSnn4n_6bysS+go9LMhtQaFqd6qC=4a25PQOP06w@mail.gmail.com> <aea79243-ddb0-efda-5f1e-eeff016b4c5e@bogus.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:58:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4_SJ2jvXCBgQruAfbnPCX1nRtkCP-sKS-ybau6_eR=zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: License File for Open Source Repositories
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZaetWJo7NUmEPalZnn0or7BsR8I>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 01:58:30 -0000

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 2:52 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> On 12/23/16 12:12 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> "open source != BSD". There are better licenses out there - notably
>> apache 2.0 is pretty clear, legally, in places where BSD is not. I am
>> also under the impression that GPLv2 has an implicit patent grant
>> (which would be a real boon in clearing some matters up long before it
>> would ever become an issue).
>>
>> But IANAL. Have you taken this proposed policy up with OSI?
>>
>> https://opensource.org/
> The statement addresses the use of and obligations of contributors to
> repositories. It does not, nor does it intend to change the licensing
> terms of contributions, present in bcp 78,79 and the TLP.

The non-answer seems to be that OSI has not been consulted.

>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 7:36 AM, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> The IESG has observed that many working groups work with open source
>>> repositories even for their work on specifications. That's great, and
>>> we're happy to see this development, as it fits well the working style
>>> of at least some of our working groups. This style is also likely to be
>>> more popular in the future.
>>>
>>> As always, we'd like to understand areas where we can either be helpful
>>> in bringing in some new things such as tooling, or where we need to
>>> integrate better between the repository world and the IETF process. As
>>> an example of the latter, we're wondering whether it would be helpful to
>>> have a standard boilerplate for these repositories with respect to the
>>> usual copyright and other matters. The intent is for such text to be
>>> placed in a suitable file (e.g., "CONTRIBUTING"), probably along with
>>> some additional information that is already present in these files in
>>> many repositories. The idea is that people should treat, e.g., text
>>> contributions to a draft-foo.xml in a repository much in the same way as
>>> they treat text contributions on the list, at least when it comes to
>>> copyright, IPR, and other similar issues.
>>>
>>> We have worked together with the IETF legal team and few key experts
>>> from the IETF who are actively using these repositories, and suggest the
>>> following text.
>>>
>>> We're looking to make a decision on this matter on our January 19th,
>>> 2017 IESG Telechat, and would appreciate feedback before then. This
>>> message will be resent after the holiday period is over to make sure it
>>> is noticed. Please send comments to the IESG (iesg@ietf.org) by 2017-01-17.
>>>
>>> The IESG
>>>
>>> ——
>>>
>>> This repository relates to activities in the Internet Engineering Task
>>> Force(IETF). All material in this repository is considered Contributions
>>> to the IETF Standards Process, as defined in the intellectual property
>>> policies of IETF currently designated as BCP 78
>>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp78), BCP 79
>>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp79) and the IETF Trust Legal
>>> Provisions (TLP) Relating to IETF Documents
>>> (http://trustee.ietf.org/trust-legal-provisions.html).
>>>
>>> Any edit, commit, pull-request, comment or other change made to this
>>> repository constitutes Contributions to the IETF Standards Process. You
>>> agree to comply with all applicable IETF policies and procedures,
>>> including, BCP 78, 79, the TLP, and the TLP rules regarding code
>>> components (e.g. being subject to a Simplified BSD License) in
>>> Contributions.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org