Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From: Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>
To: Barry Leiba <[email-masked]>
Cc: IETF discussion list <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:50:41 +0200
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>

Hi,

On 2020-3-13, at 15:43, Barry Leiba <[email-masked]> wrote:
> For convenient reference, the current rules for an IETF participant to
> be eligible to be a voting member of a NomCom (Section 4.14 of RFC
> 8713) require attendance in person at three of the last five meetings.
...
> The IESG would like the community’s input: How do *you* think 107
> should be treated in regards to NomCom eligibility?
...
> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> eligibility.

since we canceled 107, ignoring it (as you outline above) seems the obvious approach? I might be missing something, but I don't understand how that is not the obvious answer.

Thanks,
Lars