RE: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11

Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185161200FF; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mNaoz4sfh2Ng; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr730069.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.73.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F12912007C; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jQZo9LVPjiMSUw34NViQuUDqqQuFCf8ON4sUIssCAb9c72IkXEWvsGWB4ImTUBJlbDhDV5uGz8CiSrnPVfouFUi38iod8ZNNGvsepIFgCrWCisXKp9BUKqpShiP2Dzg4TkLJc0oud/qcTB07v3hVYdWRfMzGEV76iij/3v2DhbfoomZavKaEpgChMYuhCAr4DHvOYXpfrhofcmBRupWqSQwiZOn81IuCYsubVlR9w78qOD6JN2ICFtkblpuefSavDVw+vPQqq/9Ugwsr/Wke3bPCWbaXuHh6nlaBN75S1vCt96k9pNGOjNSR8yogwZZCvKpiC2FCCMnlAuPpqKHW4g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=usryS/9qjGOSKGLETnHAUBXLpKlEWI5NAYBJ2p2hdFQ=; b=LVsh/8ZUCXXHep9LRKMn1lXobXZESO6aBZthq1WIU293rKN26lKB+iOiucsQu6u7sDauTg8yXSEQwE3BM49gvGJMtsuTIFM+r1cgKPMRGzoQJ76xY9CT2IAyxmUAlJjmWHknEoVkvT1Z1wRV8dr1y0sXboGngzKrDxrQwlKWGD+00APrx9pS1hpyDz0Xp92kZbPbSfKgpI6q6pWaFzGz3/FEGxGo68Qejx0/RTYiyc7FyJhtoFxiTlC4rgqm0F/+xzY2TDDsQC7bYmwHk2bDWOt6cARpesBNtHVrYp+HfTHqkLh+AE4vcLLPPyGvIeQ0m3L2lGGC79b7YBarav8eWg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=usryS/9qjGOSKGLETnHAUBXLpKlEWI5NAYBJ2p2hdFQ=; b=qNdB9QOcW5IAp82z4tsArOkMEKu5SRsehKkAMsEZyLfqKJkjObOc+xhDkOzcMtuLyGkSK4DZbUxieqSaINyFLT8XqwAeC0Il0Z5gfP7i61fWs6jZ5OKV+uN2vtb23z8YG0xVCnWGnizxZRsIbAR3ZPkmBbRvHdF235HZMqLYFz4=
Received: from BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.138.27) by BN8PR15MB3300.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.73.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.18; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:39:51 +0000
Received: from BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29f7:5913:7460:5b58]) by BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29f7:5913:7460:5b58%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:39:51 +0000
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, "draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all" <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, regext <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
Thread-Index: AQHVgy4BBxnVg3tifEOjbDEAaQ20f6dbnKgAgABQ4oCAAA6cgIAAB5QAgAACNQCAAAHTAIAAAHrw
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:39:51 +0000
Message-ID: <BN8PR15MB264420DBC6A1EFCA8F032DF997930@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
References: <157074817849.20459.11318968277639852496@ietfa.amsl.com> <754e85cd.1470.16dce6a353a.Coremail.yaojk@cnnic.cn> <cffa265b-5df3-fdea-f57a-7af30880a154@joelhalpern.com> <5D394E0244700A5D092F1181@PSB> <c32157cf-3b18-fd01-9f0d-29bd6f4d4645@joelhalpern.com> <CALaySJLpf63gG811=az6oEfSV4hu20KDJn_rSXJ=gZQQ+OKsZw@mail.gmail.com> <e98f8b98-c6e2-a290-57d4-79e60dde49b0@joelhalpern.com> <CALaySJ+mFkf18jouy_jyE7nsB8yKKQMg7bfL0P1gpUmCgAQV0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+mFkf18jouy_jyE7nsB8yKKQMg7bfL0P1gpUmCgAQV0g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=eric.gray@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:85:4680:3329:b8d1:8e6f:2b8e:38a0]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ce95ffb2-2043-47dc-314a-08d7519f10c7
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR15MB3300:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR15MB3300E41BF84757AF7B9BD22597930@BN8PR15MB3300.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 01917B1794
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(99286004)(4326008)(2906002)(256004)(14454004)(5660300002)(25786009)(966005)(52536014)(8936002)(33656002)(71190400001)(8676002)(6436002)(81166006)(478600001)(71200400001)(81156014)(6306002)(229853002)(54906003)(110136005)(316002)(6246003)(64756008)(66556008)(55016002)(476003)(9686003)(486006)(6506007)(53546011)(305945005)(446003)(74316002)(7736002)(76176011)(7696005)(11346002)(186003)(66946007)(102836004)(76116006)(66446008)(44832011)(46003)(6116002)(86362001)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR15MB3300; H:BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: meiArXJR9jy2BF/3XK8KrerPEYaKJO9TjsvVGAeEdPcXMvZZwuYxn+WpMB+/dtg7PnXemTtL5cPzh+Eefn84wA48Dyvb5fEYNhhFVeuK5IWwmnICCbiocOSwTw4l5VRMg2ZnwxC7XO5FqzBLJ4Bj/HeNH+HWBgDaAmpjFyhOdaUxaquZfC5o7XNUrpk6Jc5V0uZQYBfMwE/kFeBORIQpZmdbJCEGhb1Fdh2Xns1VGdUIP4qZAJt+ECi1NHJnnE3D0C2LwgViWFg/1mF7pyz240eURR96/3GSVSRR3+DvNTHISWusI9sLdNEvgYhh53rFNMClsaRhAYqTBx17ui6JAG68vaNj7tNe1NO6pzRY857Cp0dyeoqjVHUu/MpmklpJzLPTNr3Pqcf6a/T0xp0ODR7/JtDbhLRrcaG+VX3+AXZehnsLR5KsEEIG560t+jxQnk4i5AK0EdIVZrggq6HTyA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ce95ffb2-2043-47dc-314a-08d7519f10c7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Oct 2019 18:39:51.8034 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xT/+wxNWUZ3JqJFn0ViCfeSsgjj0KANbXn+KykW/soJo1VEtaVwTpsnjrqYCPy+rFGA2FX8wJWRx2orBt9Wqbg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR15MB3300
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Zk7yD3Rf6uSVBsSBeDWPwH9_p6E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:39:57 -0000

I have to agree with Joel - but from a different angle.

The "normal process" seems to be that - once an ID is approved at the WG level by rough consensus - it goes to the IESG and then to the IETF as a whole.

If (for some reason) it does not gain rough consensus from the IETF as a whole (and this seems to be an extreme corner case), then it could be published as an individual RFC - but should be kicked back to the WG to make this decision.  

If it was then published as an individual (informational or experimental) RFC - that would be effectively because it first ceased to be a WG consensus draft.

This may not be obvious, but it makes more sense than assuming that the WG could cause the RFC editor to publish an ID as any kind of a WG consensus RFC without IETF concensus...

-----Original Message-----
From: Gen-art <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:34 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>; Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>; draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all <draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@ietf.org>; John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>; General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>; regext <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11

> If I think about it too much, I end up unable to parse the notion of a 
> document published on the IETF stream without IETF rough consensus.

And yet they are there today and will continue to be.

b

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art