Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 04 November 2021 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DF83A0E5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XX1qNMCJGoze for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F323A0E5C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E865C016A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:53:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=5ztiUJ 7o67Q+OtVC3i3oybmN1+pI6Ufh0LSN2afELRg=; b=XzLeXFouAHLBQy/KAL1w1P tvFIwe1H6VFqHOAtELGNEK58EwWRCwHPGcI0c55G+f4ler/Ahw87fSM9mqwXUIqY HCGvlQRnx7pidMM5NWuCl3NJJ1ksHg79qg7z8QX5l2TdrC8xSuFQaEitl1cUuVCl UJnEMC12Ftgyg+fGCRS1dHEM9BN4uuEN0mtNqcDIZGno4COoxQNYI3pd1kMa5FEY gCLfoPlJlya83Qmd46zdKHkIzOe26jVHmqz3SphDUocO024HVy7Tfw/HS4cc/ljk AEK6RIQTjV6SlKzp0SNRJe7pYhhXkG0bctIwj5K8KPjHWVszpjZTznInX4LjIRhA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JhCEYZIRxwz3WdlHQU7oCErc0ZBSyA2uWquLYknQN14KvfbAATz9hg> <xme:JhCEYVLDGWHosuBhyRcitNJSgVbKonbEFvnR-whxVEburHHrkP1koMaxZWbm8VBXU XbkldfKDuhy3w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:JhCEYRsubKDLszOm-qFAiVmKZhxrQY9qLpGjYqFBsfgh-jXd0rMo23Dmv11DPh8M9zHZyahNb_bSGlgpSsYT07bg7HNIXD2NLRmJ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrtdeggdeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeetudeigedtle dvvddtudefjeejffdvfeetjeeiueelgfdtgfegtdffkeetudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqd hhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JhCEYaZPQ68HFu6TMBvWXG27KNjl0A-hLYOc6BSo8fNMRC4O4T9-rQ> <xmx:JhCEYQbSg7Z3dZ14ex4KOAneg35lV0PBFiE0qR_Pb33gN1KmU9r0bg> <xmx:JhCEYeBsQHc11k9Fi84wG743xm9-32aqVikcb99oVj27-JnOVe6mQA> <xmx:JhCEYZlc_Q2q7gcqoM4TlcQ7kC5jwdLUU01GQi0OeTOe4sicLwYkjg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF context]
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk> <c3e9fe1b-8e48-a364-9e25-4084dac70889@meetinghouse.net> <3a6bf8ad-5492-0942-a451-6317e8a93705@network-heretics.com> <3e685576-a230-a7c4-f371-d66a55aa820d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7a087707-499f-e3bf-8701-1a58930a8a22@meetinghouse.net> <4ec32d7a-a17b-635b-91bc-4152313d6800@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <885e62bf-7d6a-4501-a48a-e7c2cbf20382@joelhalpern.com> <e59adb61-a55c-7f5f-a60a-40bf186c139d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CAC8QAceMSrfkqGTYcMNr3JargO3gxJqTaEyf02LGHd-KVeUDHw@mail.gmail.com> <6286da3e-2beb-9556-089a-2e1951573b1e@gmail.com> <59c80b60-438f-b10f-ad61-ba839f6e4f95@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <e834916e85ea47ef94fce07c23928d2b@huawei.com> <37b299c8-e821-07e5-6240-68fb9d1ca137@gmail.com> <23b450fb11eb4a51bb4ee837b5c52657@huawei.com> <a805b50d-3ccd-dd2a-4931-6c6dc9a8ede3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CAC8QAceY1gtK5v3WGMd4OB0z826jDiDDw_g1LbjWef7MKTnrcg@mail.gmail.com> <eae026b8fc7a42eeb2210dcb156d5f56@huawei.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <8007ec69-628a-448a-28f3-090b6fdab999@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:53:56 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <eae026b8fc7a42eeb2210dcb156d5f56@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A665DA1B2DD9D3AE9D1CA489"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Zka7DXBcwbSiXkNUbeeU46y5UIE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:54:07 -0000

On 11/4/21 12:26 PM, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:

> Interface ID is still not used for something usefull, but ND creates a 
> lot of problems.
>
> It is still possible to return it to MAC and cancel the biggest part 
> of the ND that creates a lot of problems.
>
For privacy reasons alone, I'd say that's a non-starter.

Keith