Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (was List moderator action)
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 08 May 2026 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37518EAEF0C1 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778201789; bh=R6ncOORX5tykCEGe23qVIlCfvzoioXkb5ydpxy8R1P8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=omqis/E4TtVeYcM06b2t6svv0vWtWcWdTkFy9DZH1T6m9T9yfZGXTayIy4TCSLLBg G0jLqk4tDRYFLQbde0P0pxbQ5f2HUFxJgsOi0BqaMgvAbALCr06IAHVIKRQa9RZWH+ 2N1hBT3blXX6DkmDHJvsXnlx8gOKY0HEtCi9qtOM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e00lvdYrN_ZG for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DAAEAEF0BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-82f8b60e54dso1031443b3a.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 May 2026 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778201781; x=1778806581; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R6ncOORX5tykCEGe23qVIlCfvzoioXkb5ydpxy8R1P8=; b=JcRyR22ZICuFWYFXyxsHLRXBgeSi0d8DLtqa97tyUEvquXTkcsdzeW16zyRKWvyREX N/Ab/aptYq4aXGJ1gUZXLTpidtX0YgpZMtDPCZIrvsBpsN86XtbOZcEPpDD7NSpLFmGR VaTWO/TivNqNrHubq6KDMmp/PO/tB3lbjcySLtv1CXaAZS3Rr6878Eru1XrPVf6l1Zly w4f4vtk7y0lbt1q4mC5pgfjrsb80ampeAKI3PEEvX+T2smg6kriyCRiBEYlUUIwulscX 2L1jFyRp9qhhAVIrqlWSLmx8KQWTqs2q4RsALHiqLbxc6b1Tz0iB3uQ0jQCUwzI3bPYH HXkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778201781; x=1778806581; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=R6ncOORX5tykCEGe23qVIlCfvzoioXkb5ydpxy8R1P8=; b=cVPM9X2J68txL1QCF1UZb/mOoZVWSNKwImtUiHzXZZU99rqnp6/uO9iki+gIOtoQIM 2uQZD1kaEGa28Hyr+C2VgKHybVhKNcpLCrZQJQ/LQgt57w6y3gSKFxgwo0M2N6Xar501 WcCowmAs06rwjnMtR8vr6ZN8N4ZAjQSI1jGt1GWQKOlJkCQtI/3KSN00HuWc9kg8n1lc 5DX2Lzs3Uu5AndL1tzYEbTtJy9vFetM00DLxqa/Hg+neL73lcKMJ0gDMOMn4g0ecWtQP Sv5blg002I48FqZMwwAB79XEwhOmx8mS0qpSoKe2VwRMecFD2aKMcuDCFY6mvj3gxmkb 4otQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+mbGcoe9koOTmQErBPZbScizmaB+8pCv+j+eZFxRLwe1B2nzsnJQJNAMg/huTNinVfo2KC@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzIy67gTH/drWLSxxbXuEZkLOkAsFHdVlpKDdmSn6MzXmA1JvXk DHj04/AzQEFScIv4XL2xAVGxU6680Tlu8CiwEOtUzTJW+Q5H9z2Ng94a
X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievNgBP5i1Q3CYfk8A6uUOLsQVjgqbfuXfSK5E5F3cUPjnWJ52yVv9rAQpN5pAZ w3PX6jkZMnW287YsRo4y/UQ6SmBCppMjMjd0m3/abc0Pq6wvNXUGdA8mfPrVVldRZFAZk7GBmEJ BF9zcEEio/7FwjrOprKUrOuRRtKKeffHCIISWj1WKUEYpeM+4lAxYDi6OH6prsJrZ/TMWuJ61d4 zQWz7wuUrnT8Q8z1xF9QJhybI+uXOmsY949IRzSV4SPBGf+uEsguUK1zFPP3UXIekkfIsE/G0d/ MR7cvgOhg9yXhWD0CRE9/UxDKRM2I0piW6YZd7N4sKNnV4+YMunyNf1/rRQ++I8XfgcMIvF+0dG 8NvHFx9u7qcb0GctAztAyWuUkBMsRwyxXtu3ROb2E8SKxawLINbqN9Lqi+cE2RR74z9jWGI4eAx ge1OYfjDPhF1A0dcBFjF2+b4fVjKYq/JungMPIzORhxTmRuIqMwAlpUf18RmQcD/MjGIpzXuKfE qdEaswDfgvSPX80WA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:198c:b0:81f:3f03:6846 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-83a5ea41bb8mr10329389b3a.47.1778201781222; Thu, 07 May 2026 17:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:a100:1829:5956:ca53:df83:6568? ([2404:4400:a100:1829:5956:ca53:df83:6568]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-8396563f049sm11769943b3a.7.2026.05.07.17.56.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 May 2026 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <78d147a0-939c-43ba-9f96-926c30852af5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 12:56:16 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (was List moderator action)
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@ietf.email>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6Sy1jsjNzh1qMEDVx7ABp_1_uPkfx_tY-T7zPpXTdZiXtQ@mail.gmail.com> <877bpgb7bq.fsf@josefsson.org> <c7aae006-be27-4beb-9553-0b8efb4bd600@gmail.com> <MN2PR17MB4031C41F79382775E779E441CD3C2@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <20260507183806.039971088CBBE@ary.qy>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260507183806.039971088CBBE@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-ID-Hash: QKEREYZF4R6RHBGFTLZK3QGZ6K5DX3NG
X-Message-ID-Hash: QKEREYZF4R6RHBGFTLZK3QGZ6K5DX3NG
X-MailFrom: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Zrd1YDNlcBD0cWa9EKCFf3L11kQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
On 08-May-26 06:38, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> said: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> * >> Therefore, IMHO it would be perfectly reasonable to disallow "no >> * >> derivative rights" for all IETF stream contributions. >> >> That�s a really bad idea. For example, I could post a draft with no-derivative as a trial balloon to see if the IETF is interested, say as a DISPATCH presentation. If not, >> then I am free to take it to other places or to seek a patent. > > Twenty years ago I would have agreed with you. These days, it would take about > 10 seconds to stick a draft or draft-like thing on a server somewhere else and > send a note to an IETF list saying take a look at my document at https://blah > and tell us if you're interested. > > Considering the length of this thread, I think the simplification would be worth it. > I realize there is a process nit about how you might ask to DISPATCH somehthing if > there isn't an I-D but I think we can deal with it. > > By my count there have been 21 RFCs published with "no derivatives" lanaguage, > the most recent RFC8216 in 2017. The last in the IETF stream was RFC7016 in > 2013, over a decade ago. And it could not be published in the IETF stream today, per RFC 8789. Are there any other exemplars between RFC 5378 and RFC 8216? Brian
- List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Eric Heflin
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action Stephen Farrell
- Re: List moderator action Nick Hilliard
- Re: List moderator action Christian Hopps
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Bron Gondwana
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Tom Beecher
- Re: List moderator action Lars Eggert
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Eliot Lear
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Salz, Rich
- Re: List moderator action Livingood, Jason
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Stephen Farrell
- Re: List moderator action Jay Daley
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Jay Daley
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Livingood, Jason
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Joel Halpern
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Simon Josefsson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Simon Josefsson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Lars Eggert
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scudder, John
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John Levine
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Salz, Rich
- Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Jay Daley
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Salz, Rich
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John C Klensin
- Re: Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John C Klensin
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott O. Bradner
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John C Klensin
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John C Klensin
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Joel Halpern
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… S Moonesamy
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John R Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) George Michaelson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre