IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sat, 14 September 2013 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4421F8BFD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 05:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-Ug46WU4iGK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 05:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 64C3521F88B7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 05:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1731 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2013 12:44:02 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 14 Sep 2013 12:44:02 -0000
Message-ID: <52345AD3.4040603@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 21:47:15 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
References: <CAGhGL2APj-XfuMUHgLsELnZRbRNCLrjMBxFBtcg4zx+5SG7Bag@mail.gmail.com> <3C96E4A9-7E78-421F-A437-7091AEBEB5AA@ogud.com> <20130910224518.GA99190@isc.org> <CAJ1+nORZwf-Nh1M_xC4Hn-MWmvgCmg-S6N0w-iAtzhg89MyVvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1+nORZwf-Nh1M_xC4Hn-MWmvgCmg-S6N0w-iAtzhg89MyVvw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:49:20 -0000

robert bownes wrote:

> A 1pulse per second aligned to GPS is good to a few ns.

GPS time may be accurate, if it were assured to be secure.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status