Re: Updating BCP 10 -- round two

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E191A1A25 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:45:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VN6eF__p78ZV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362BA1A1A12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10E1BC1F4B; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:45:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-70-106-134-12.clppva.east.verizon.net [70.106.134.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F5251BC1F48; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54DB8709.1050405@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:44:57 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- round two
References: <CAL0qLwbGG2=VgmUWEE6W3D+0qennThqnCP85X0Q85i94meu68g@mail.gmail.com> <6409.1423672454@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYobxBDuE0WG2t+kviGm=Wwj3RJqVh7y0yHH0uX7KWVfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYobxBDuE0WG2t+kviGm=Wwj3RJqVh7y0yHH0uX7KWVfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZwrMEkhgpnFk2cZqDMbr0HuIdOU>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:45:05 -0000

In theory the idea of trying to recognize a broader class of 
sufficiently involved participants sounds good.
The details did not seem to work for me, but I am happy to wait and see 
the next version of a specific proposal.

Yours,
Joel

On 2/11/15 11:40 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Actually I thought it had ample support, but just needed some
> clarification about how it would work when stretched over longer time
> frames.
>
> On Feb 11, 2015 8:34 AM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
> <mailto:mcr%2Bietf@sandelman.ca>> wrote:
>
>
>     Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com
>     <mailto:superuser@gmail.com>> wrote:
>          > (b) Michael's suggestion to re-work eligibility (needs more
>     discussion or
>          > an actual text proposal).
>
>     So far, I'm not hearing much support or any clear opposition for the
>     idea.
>
>     --
>     Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca
>     <mailto:mcr%2BIETF@sandelman.ca>>, Sandelman Software Works
>       -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>