IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Wed, 11 February 2009 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mshore@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E523C28C132; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:53:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHJvdQ6K7gxS; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B528C1BA; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:53:20 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,192,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="36731381"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2009 14:53:24 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1BErOEc027854; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:53:24 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1BErOHm023520; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:53:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:53:24 -0500
Received: from 10.98.54.215 ([10.98.54.215]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:53:24 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.0.0.071130
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:53:22 -0500
Subject: Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Powers Chuck-RXCP20 <Chuck.Powers@motorola.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-housley-tls-authz-extns@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <C5B85092.3119%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
Thread-Index: AcmMCA3dvLrXmccESwC9JuY2opGSAAATbiwQAACtVNE=
In-Reply-To: <2963ECA56B01F94B9964469DCB8A2B5A055C7C6E@de01exm69.ds.mot.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2009 14:53:24.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D95CDB0:01C98C58]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=628; t=1234364004; x=1235228004; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20TLS=20WG=20Chair=20Comments=20on=20draf t-ietf-tls-authz-07 |Sender:=20 |To:=20Powers=20Chuck-RXCP20=20<Chuck.Powers@motorola.com>, =0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Eric=20Rescorla=20<ekr@networkres onance.com>,=20<iesg@ietf.org>,=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20<i etf@ietf.org>,=20<draft-housley-tls-authz-extns@tools.ietf.o rg>; bh=W1VDNysccglLpUPC9bwQClRdd+UHd3sSFYbvvsdgL+4=; b=oeL7dGYIlrj5MY+RDe3gU2azx3MTOba1lkzQeRyW5JjjQ2czGV5F2qqIU0 a2cz+4NuJOB1h8wkUYIy6+r+gFLk6lzcHLHWqbkFM9MaYnRg22M2opS13dQg lQhIH0x2pQ;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:53:22 -0000

On 2/11/09 9:47 AM, "Powers Chuck-RXCP20" <Chuck.Powers@motorola.com> wrote:
> I am curious - is this a commitment by the TLS chairs to actually work
> on this document? Or simply an attempt to prevent the IESG from
> advancing a document that the WG previously declined to work on, and
> could easily do so again?

I have no idea what Eric is thinking but I do think
that the environment has changed and that there's now
a lot more interest in authorization than there was
a few years ago.  That is to say, I think there are
more people who'd be able and/or inclined to work on
progressing the document.

Melinda

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status