RE: ietf.org end-to-end principle

Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@jisc.ac.uk> Fri, 18 March 2016 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <josh.howlett@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673C412D7B0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=jisc365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QBJfCmZ8O6p4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C34412D53B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lrp0019.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.19]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-4-LM6oToNUSZecLaRpKEIOqQ-1; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:32 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jisc-ac-uk; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=oGYqcrO3UbP5DtdiillFFilqKrgTjyow/MKNIgSSkhA=; b=Ke6TWA9QUrGHuI8kzk0Y3SlW4kYCSXeQIniinFcrcMNvSIEMET3DRVwEAk/5Ml5r6SSlvnVdR+gYOTETtM0msWCO21/RZOJDRwHls62GZDYD17aif6ut0JVmMJzDiP6z/5TB2yDfEkDFO3V1hNEbnqrdQuNd82EMwQGc5UEdHis=
Received: from VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.165.239.15) by VI1PR07MB1584.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.165.239.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.7; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:27 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.239.15]) by VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.239.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0443.010; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:26 +0000
From: Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: ietf.org end-to-end principle
Thread-Topic: ietf.org end-to-end principle
Thread-Index: AQHRgCMbFsy2aow5e06+N5kLx9TdW59dXJtQgAAOEACAAANm8IAAVHWAgAEu0PA=
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:26 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB15815C6BA404E37960EA5D19BC8C0@VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <56E90BF9.4090306@cisco.com> <871189680.1322359.1458113811142.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHw9_i+yFhJVYvcMLSEgkOkqJjZBsQicCQsi13SaoVQuzxqc8g@mail.gmail.com> <5D6893D1-D61C-490C-91EF-CA5E5C1F484A@piuha.net> <56EA63E3.2070602@restena.lu> <VI1PR07MB15815DEAB1939141F0DCCCF3BC8B0@VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <56EA82FC.5050400@restena.lu> <VI1PR07MB158106641F22B29E9ED35320BC8B0@VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <56EACCAF.209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <56EACCAF.209@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [86.129.140.73]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cffe7405-2e06-45ec-6a7f-08d34f17e710
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR07MB1584; 5:nKaFW9J3UynNBcMlkJdrx16KzB7QVxpmkPkdKT8cFelEGbj6Wtn+8P9hJ1UDt+nzVCPlpIuehcPK8f49pT9353gUH7G+3UqaFybT2ZlIXQYDQ02cGgX46hF6i0HpcZ8K/JtYOvAUOtU6o/UHJudBew==; 24:LlLLw1Q7weSqTxE71BmTsl4Mf3+4+PemhEB9iT4qyTMvlORKSeamkW8yKfPe7U1ChGmaPggjCM24POg1ydqRpI1YWHkHhXQkHAIUHNLZnxQ=; 20:ptXtBo60BvVsCHgTQgsLasLTwtGqWOgL++45KA5JuJNIpua8GnauoisRQ3XGI6b9ouIM2Zd22ySQrPXgc6TZq0fjxNVNCYmOp20mqHsIM92Q1+OPKgX0SQ9a7rKhCG4Qoo/wswEt29hUQz4GU5EquRmrFuUAb2O+Rq1fFmkENlw=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR07MB1584;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB158498C60CD579BC2AD82320BC8C0@VI1PR07MB1584.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:VI1PR07MB1584; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1584;
x-forefront-prvs: 088552DE73
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(51444003)(81166005)(5008740100001)(92566002)(33656002)(5002640100001)(76576001)(3660700001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(3280700002)(74482002)(74316001)(122556002)(2501003)(2906002)(77096005)(230783001)(87936001)(106116001)(50986999)(86362001)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(5001770100001)(93886004)(54356999)(76176999)(66066001)(586003)(5003600100002)(189998001)(5004730100002)(1096002)(1220700001)(107886002)(10400500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1584; H:VI1PR07MB1581.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Mar 2016 10:27:26.6951 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB1584
X-MC-Unique: LM6oToNUSZecLaRpKEIOqQ-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZxI-PCWn6PRO-Wo-vqWh56Dpdic>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:02:27 -0700
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:53 -0000

> >  E2e places the cost of interoperability on the ends, where it belongs.
> 
> The basic principle (it's NOT an argument) is that functions should go where
> they most efficiently belong.

Yes. I think that's a fine restatement in terms of architectural optimisation. Personally I prefer to think about this in terms of costs, because it's all too easy to conflate "efficient" with "cost effective". There is often a correlation, but not always, and of course it is the latter that actually drives procurement and so deployment.

(The actor bearing the cost isn't necessarily the one performing the architectural function. I pay my ISP to run BGP; in principal I could make alternative arrangements myself that could yield greater efficiency, but it would be wildly less cost effective).
 
A corollary to this is that designing successfully for systemic efficiency is really hard if you don't understand how the costs will be bourn throughout the system.

Josh.

Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.