Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 26 March 2016 20:00 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572F512D59E
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EEvBzexQDUkw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DD012D560
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x231.google.com with SMTP id tt10so68900795pab.3
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent
:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=PvPm3HrLL6k/MUj8X/QLSFCMmkCTxCtD6RnaLjP+QtA=;
b=raJrwiApYRzyrrzrTKR7F1fBALgczutzABzVbIkVzMDQbpNOOm2cw1V8BTqv60Mp0H
c/zSLRu78wQ72fREH7Y3pLrxsfXpY+RjbDeynRsRYVQMG20WsHQTts1mO/4JD+5AyVlO
hEujtYHezqvpG6Y/q8+FSQPe6WhcBOs6Er4I6opQ1sm/urS0XhbH/hUebCLLpyeozSyE
hKLSh9EVl1jHXaUVnRMyAkrFixtMNk1ZFhSrmfl7UaHM8yXuLiRnb1bEhYh3BcCnlOF1
wsU1jpHiMfUoSVxlbYGRy9wKh3O6mAG1Bi6+lw0AJwksSwQZpuSv49j8uZrobMdKtsRO
Dqqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization
:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=PvPm3HrLL6k/MUj8X/QLSFCMmkCTxCtD6RnaLjP+QtA=;
b=dT64TuKEOzrIuM/zrqkqUjOMXvtnUNojvC6bdgeTTw8f0FoWDjggfymJpt8pLWQhtn
aCYE997T2ImBvXrUa2JCnfW6el5lU7KRYX/D1TTWLPPSRLpzy4l6pALwG+IT1h/ctDZQ
V2+Uz+7NFub/4/YMfEfEl/iddfqS81Fba/3oKmY8HJY63IXP/BMpasx2Mrwa9AyDffbd
ZRAW3qyP6yMbqntabEzHF78cz5NXn8DELc47PpwKvxBX5QeAsXiVMwu7G6NKUOlO9ciJ
FLm61YZ/x66qgIWFf+S5JWoOZ98BWQqvfCv1sV59QO9QLnDUimsD+epHfs+NH1s5Mj3i
It8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKs0DHRgkxu9AaxigIRxVM622jZR65GqBlUQmy8HOA0WoXDcGCjmqHndJlBgPXgRw==
X-Received: by 10.66.244.233 with SMTP id xj9mr30837723pac.19.1459022429225;
Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:738b:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781?
([2406:e007:738b:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ml5sm24933601pab.2.2016.03.26.13.00.25
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual
Property Rights in IETF Technology")
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>,
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net>
<DC9B799D-A1EF-457C-B791-9F103FDA7CD6@vigilsec.com>
<56F59441.8030901@gmail.com> <FDF935D9B80D3F03F2A93CD8@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
<tsl4mbuxpbd.fsf@mit.edu> <56F65800.6050001@alvestrand.no>
<4B58C75DE70D7D327C92DE6C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56F6EA66.6060602@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:00:38 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B58C75DE70D7D327C92DE6C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZxTr9xeEh9BHDrrJ3ilePYE1C6g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 20:00:31 -0000
On 27/03/2016 03:17, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:36 +0100 Harald Alvestrand > <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > >> If the documents clearly define the term "design team" as >> teams that are created by a decision in an IETF process, I >> have very few problem extending "IETF contribution" to >> contributions to the design team. >> >> If (as I've sometimes seen) everyone who meets to hash out an >> idea wants to call themselves + their friends is a "design >> team", then I see a problem with the extension. >> >> The lunchtime "bar BOF" would be a nice test case - arranged >> by WG chairs over the WG (or IETF non-WG) mailing list, it >> would be an IETF activity with IETF contribution; arranged >> between friends on the way out of the preceding WG meeting, it >> would (I think) not be. > > I think this is a good summary of a reasonable way to draw the > line. I agree. In terms of wording in the draft, I'll repeat that referring to RFC 2418 seems appropriate (rather than relying on duplicate definitions of terms). To be exact, perhaps: Such statements include oral statements, as well as written and electronic communications, which are addressed to: o the IETF plenary session, o any IETF working group [BCP25] or portion thereof, o any IETF "birds of a feather" (BOF) session or portion thereof, o any IETF design team [BCP25] or portion thereof, o the IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, ... (I intentionally deleted "-sanctioned". As far as I can see it's redundant and confuses the issue.) Incidentally, does the "the IESG, or any member thereof" cover IETF Directorates, which are established by individual IESG members? Brian > For the second case, I do note that there have been > attempts by non-participants to define the second sort of group > as a design team in order to give them (or the WG Chairs) > leverage over membership and participation. But I'd hope to > keep that separate... and a WG Chair could, subject to appeal, > designate such a group as a design team if it seemed to be > getting out of hand, so maybe there is no problem in practice. > > john > > > >
- Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("In… Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott Bradner
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott Bradner
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott O. Bradner
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Alissa Cooper
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … joel jaeggli
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Eggert, Lars
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Ben Campbell
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Scott Bradner
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … joel jaeggli
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … joel jaeggli
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Pete Resnick
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Alissa Cooper
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Alissa Cooper
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Michael Cameron
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … John C Klensin
- RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Pete Resnick
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt … Pete Resnick