IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPmix.

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 20 November 2016 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04FF12949E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JEX6nwH5B0MM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DB012948C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f188so122154889pgc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pBYEybm7AyK81YXdW8A13YZOLS2wNxA/mJXdy6Mzixw=; b=qeiu5+w+Lx/Mbo24DGsYx1Q3zjO35jYpC0f2cJFjK3cmh1hs07YaPi8lyW6eRXLLN3 YpiaFnzQPWlElonRMGMLjQuB0X/Kgyz5ES5OIAbFlNOqvO+naj/4p8lQsg088f5usrE+ HiljJKahdSls7KpBCuoERykvERgicuUYA5C2L3Rbgij/Af9MQoE5uLK2X8C+ls6d/yTK OoPQbgq4x4AkNnR4JIEJeaJvAEoR532e8SlkRAROoEKqPiNSpNlzYX+nPoyeTnRev+6e 07EexNuTKxzN5SrIrveyYA1jpvoVWGCIiABzrhWmmKC9AtHHOIXv3OXpTAbeXwX75OaI pGbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pBYEybm7AyK81YXdW8A13YZOLS2wNxA/mJXdy6Mzixw=; b=ZNNCVTPjkW57YZWVk4dyx4bYzoRqM/nBC1CfqVQdVBcZ3I3Gm33Dz67kw4gkSMygC6 FhWBq4v/e9ZJDeJ5ciQULQ2brIN0epWaSfYxxw2413ZTs2mxmExwH0zbGmMLCzjqIL38 uc0EjF+s2UvHkJMQSWTlPDc7Z3QZbvLS7GejleH9VonNvEzNkuHjSUuJdE5Qd6mJAhj5 Zv2Zc2Bn4E6Op/qAQlw9KwGvGIhjGPz1sd1c/M5rA+jcR4KkWEEQe7AK4Pz0k2YbEW8W Q53cXJmOn6U5yfGO2oO6IweG3c0sn/2IAoURkKkfI3pRheTM1mWxo4Ush1ZcJhysCwky 8lRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01F4qsaIfjRxCHvcgzZxsOTmzzRpMDQPUoQkNe3dN8tyySX1QZNWyyQ+vaBMHUCCQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.123.22 with SMTP id w22mr23304000pgc.155.1479670514576; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (77.219.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.219.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm31955638pft.25.2016.11.20.11.35.12 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: IPmix.
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <HE1PR04MB144901D56F1E2DC6A770D2EEBDB20@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20161120100322.0acc97f8@elandnews.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <30ce688c-9891-a829-3d32-fbbacbfd3ee0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:35:11 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20161120100322.0acc97f8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_3ZuZ6F3-XSQWaDG9lQFZMzxdPA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:35:17 -0000

SM,

The right place to discuss this draft was the big-internet@munnari.oz.au list
in 1992-1994. As several people have tried to explain to the author, both on-list
and off-list, this class of proposal was overtaken by events many years ago.
It really attempts, but fails, to solve the problem that has already been solved
in all popular operating systems by the implementation of dual stacks. Its chance
of success in the real Internet is precisely zero.

I strongly encourage the author, who is clearly technically competent, to work
on current problems. (Also to start by reading https://www.ietf.org/newcomers.html.)

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 21/11/2016 08:05, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Khaled,
> At 09:44 20-11-2016, Khaled Omar wrote:
>> You can find the new modified IPmix text RFC version attached.
> 
> The usual way to submit an Internet-Draft is through 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/
> 
> The Sergeant-at-arms wrote a message [1] about the previous document 
> which was sent as an attachment. He stated that "you need to check 
> with the relevant chairs to find the right venue" [1].  In my opinion 
> the ietf@ietf.org mailing list is not the best venue to discuss about 
> your proposal as the Sergeant-at-arms already commented about that in 
> his message.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> 1. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg99875.html 
> 
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status