Re: Options for temporary operational solution to DMARC problem

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sun, 06 November 2016 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE387129862 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:11:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TwXuMC-CgcfR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F302129856 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7723F205A0; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:26:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0331637A8; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:11:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: Options for temporary operational solution to DMARC problem
In-Reply-To: <20161104024822.74577.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20161104024822.74577.qmail@ary.lan>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <10588.1478470261.1@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:11:01 -0500
Message-ID: <10589.1478470261@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_9rP7D4A7wbJnTxVSnR0XTx8crs>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 22:11:05 -0000

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    > If the IESG believes that even though we've had this problem for 2 1/2
    > years, we need to do something about it NOW NOW NOW rather than waiting
    > a few more months for ARC, I strongly recommend the per-sender rewrite.

We've had serious problems for 2 + years, and we've been told "wait a few
months" multiple times now.  I can live with any temporary solution, as long
as deploying ARC is our clear goal.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [