IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed Update to Note Well

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FE921F86FD; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGDqO+Xpk9bk; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB9D21F8759; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA6651ECB41D; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:46:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:46:16 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed Update to Note Well
Message-ID: <20120622154616.GF44040@mail.yitter.info>
References: <CC09D19A.884F1%stewe@stewe.org> <4FE48B52.3080900@stpeter.im> <CALaySJ+1a13uKSLRbdUzadZLBVzrer5tkWAwoyNX-DyNLC5FTQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+1a13uKSLRbdUzadZLBVzrer5tkWAwoyNX-DyNLC5FTQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:46:32 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:27:12AM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:

> reasonable expect people to read on the screen, and chairs to read
> aloud in meetings without its sounding like the disclaimer on a
> pharmaceutical advert. 

If the chairs are going to read boilerplate in meetings all week long,
it's going to sound like such a disclaimer anyway.  I'm happy about
the "short", but I don't understand the reason that the notice will
need to be read out loud.  Is such a requirement the plan?  If so,
why?

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email