Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'

Ofer Inbar <cos@aaaaa.org> Thu, 22 April 2021 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cos@aaaaa.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F2C3A1349 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxmhrtuY4-XE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miplet.aaaaa.org (miplet.aaaaa.org [104.131.172.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920083A1340 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by miplet.aaaaa.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id F18423FE2B; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:31:00 -0400
From: Ofer Inbar <cos@aaaaa.org>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
Message-ID: <20210422223100.GA2544@miplet.aaaaa.org>
References: <161859546000.27694.13585496003852397044@ietfa.amsl.com> <6081A148.7070701@btconnect.com> <8279565a-ee50-ab3a-8b97-afc6ca23f4ba@gmail.com> <bf5f53fb-0aad-941d-a683-e7c40165cbac@nostrum.com> <7b9e4b99-7bec-39c3-be92-44482829e41b@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7b9e4b99-7bec-39c3-be92-44482829e41b@network-heretics.com>
Organization: American Association Against Acronym Abuse
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_EHcvM6aX1v437455D65poYX1M0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:31:36 -0000

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:27:22PM -0400,
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> What I'd really like to see is the ability to subscribe to Last Call
> discussions on a per-wg, per-topic, or per-area basis. Because I
> often identify particular WGs or discussions that will be
> interesting to me in some way, and would definitely like to review
> their drafts, but don't have enough time to read all of their
> mailing list traffic.   Of course I'm perfectly capable of writing
> code to filter the various lists and rearrange their output to
> better suit me.    But the way we present this information to
> participants by default does affect how our organization works, and
> not necessarily for the better.

Would adding area and WG tags in an email header to the initial
announcement to last-call, in a standard format, make it easy enough
for people to set up something to alert them to the ones they care
about?
  -- Cos