Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA212D625 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pHW5cp5Dqw5t for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093E212D5A7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g3so256875845ywa.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=WrBZKBlwlEWzZy9FnLrfKtI5m5nG36d7E0ruGxX8yMQ=; b=YxvsI5jdlBIMY42s9liQtb3CsahYvy9KQv70L8zDpVmSsx2tNEl2xTDx6b+DFYDHjz wyMBLVFujXTjokIw70CSBozWW8VAYZOy2HWmQnqgDNHAgLWlGpzeea+29WTj+yIGBU9K XGaT4jE1IHm1RHe7LAHg9ykllc3uA0XBuNmr0bKhx0So5ZTtN+GZ8Kcy3woSf4Kp1G6I i74vK1AQippTNde+QTKaqzOnR6XdyUXCopxm2yFz+YjPNtwnh0iky+Ega7J99QVCPZ+A epADX9gKUmB71+vGmgVv+2JpuYY7zHH9v6ha9GMQkeroG57uaV8JVEAR492RqSc0ohqs qfeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=WrBZKBlwlEWzZy9FnLrfKtI5m5nG36d7E0ruGxX8yMQ=; b=T4c1X9YXppMnNcIMbOEKomFmkOMDx1xlaZ/eqONqzTwWVaNEA22C7plM6HACe2kPeU oCiBwi/ytW2Q8mBukV4AQo7SbIvspQoiCkHciU6MMuxEXrg14dI24AwJbUjEVV9BitWz 7oT3lEAqQ8S+fHQPnkFNpZegwaxQvmH3GLhE9lq8QrbPQwCsIaW1DrVxY++75EGjJBL+ fYfMrzzWj3BW6wd7cmC8+Vco+h1x3NqxOuk/VhCZRFDcKSUAalHsE6TFp9UTSzFUF6Ca +MFDTcLUtHmK3/EGU7VvBh9PbGvjv313ziwGAw+uzWy6l7jWuPJDjt9XIs1NMXmQcBvf 5m0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKrR3oSQzhH4eb9Igyz2TD9p5UIEbU7O2Oi7FWx7vc60thecGg2wOMrIAIp24FEw7UIETqnAgE6GUJGxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.155.137 with SMTP id s131mr5028878ywg.24.1459783455315; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.211 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.211 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKBrjKEdu-qd067Eb7A+nZFObB3TdwSV=od9GDjhDOecQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net> <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com> <ACC702C9-C33F-4D38-B47A-8BC293D24621@sobco.com> <DCA1B6AC-6221-4CF5-A726-E1E98DBFAC27@vigilsec.com> <56FC90E5.1050908@gmail.com> <CAC4RtVD3Pxm_vZgdCCgPgDwNfnYeKFJ5_Ys3QQPezrHzTGJE+Q@mail.gmail.com> <C5F35DA9-C530-4EC6-B175-C4B0A18872D7@stewe.org> <CALaySJ+1rvxXnXmLxk1UJ88t-e2p24OyMhR3f6P0peA5fLhRGA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKBrjKEdu-qd067Eb7A+nZFObB3TdwSV=od9GDjhDOecQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:24:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-ev-TbYBxtJv-tgddPf+bNuKAPCuRC8r0rhsVT8xU+FdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b927c4d9e83052faa5260
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_EKkjNOR7vH4YWQy3ZrmoQ9m9NI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:24:17 -0000

Just chiming in ...

On Apr 4, 2016 11:39 AM, "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> Or perhaps we want to separate WGCs from ADs here, and the text needs
> more work in any case, but I hope people see the general point.

I made the point previously that I am a TSV AD, but when I'm following work
in one of Martin's TSV working groups, that's the exception, rather than
the rule.

I would hope that all of the chairs in a working group are following all of
the work in their own working group fairly closely.

So I think Barry's suggestion to consider ADs and WG chairs separately
makes sense (even if it turns out that the distinction is required).

Spencer