Re: PS Characterization Clarified
Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> Fri, 13 September 2013 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF7B21E80C7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A64bWTy7nHo6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAD121E8098 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:7211:24ff:fe8c:627a] ([IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:7211:24ff:fe8c:627a]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8DEuYBo055400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olaf@NLnetLabs.nl)
Authentication-Results: open.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 open.nlnetlabs.nl r8DEuYBo055400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1379084200; bh=JeTs0OxrNaabjZlD1/VLANokRwCtjCy5f2UU06D9WJQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=fBw59VhOledZgeRxDE0WZlHfOoZY7T6IWC5wW9Vyy6jHr5o2wpBAEQwmFR6Mn43cR rp1y8iKYJ7TqkkBkbPyd2nTGwh6TslEEiW0fdZzsys/q/liePAJPC4PLLG+EAFgg02 uqPDyljK0280wEZOKFEBVPlxEIlut0AUFy67mBLM=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_03BDCF8D-3E18-41BF-8044-4AD49EE7D620"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: PS Characterization Clarified
From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <522761EB.2000002@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:34 +0200
Message-Id: <13BBB594-4510-4903-917B-67D39F60E2BD@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <B8F661D1-1C45-4A4B-9EFE-C7E32A7654E7@NLnetLabs.nl> <9B5010D3-EA47-49AD-B9D0-08148B7428FC@piuha.net> <CAC4RtVDXVqZkCi1stmuoxawUVDi6+uG-bXWp36CM6-bsqNjiew@mail.gmail.com> <EC75AB54-8B11-42B9-8049-F70D09DB1775@NLnetLabs.nl> <CAC4RtVDj3tBChrJBiBiD6uwOtGRJHLDYeh62XbERrHp0i1Fmfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP-DXq0=FX9nFDCo0HXvWKNRTJ+8ay=m7J=JyRxJciN-vw@mail.gmail.com> <522761EB.2000002@gmail.com>
To: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::53]); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:56:40 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: SM Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, John Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:57:18 -0000
Colleagues [I have added a number of people who were active in the discussion previously to the CC, my apologies if that is bad etiquette but I wanted to make you explicitly aware of this.] Based on the discussion so far I've made a few modifications to the draft. I am trying to consciously keep this document to the minimum that is needed to achieve 'less is more' and my feeling is that where we are now is close to the sweetspot of consensus. This is the summary of these changes: * Added "Updates 2026" and added Sean's initial" * Copied the whole characterization pararaph for Internet Standards from 2026, instead of only the line that is the actual characterization itself. * Added the Further Consideration section based on discussion on the mailinglist. See: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-01.txt For diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-01.txt --Olaf
- PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Jari Arkko
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Brian E Carpenter
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Jari Arkko
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott Brim
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Jari Arkko
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Barry Leiba
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O. Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott Brim
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Ted Lemon
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Barry Leiba
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Randy Bush
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Spencer Dawkins
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified S Moonesamy
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Barry Leiba
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Carsten Bormann
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- RE: PS Characterization Clarified Adrian Farrel
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Carsten Bormann
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Barry Leiba
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Why we don't want to actually replace 2026 (was: … S Moonesamy
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Dave Cridland
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Alexey Melnikov
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott Brim
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Why we don't want to actually replace 2026 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Pete Resnick
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O. Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Pete Resnick
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified John C Klensin
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Olaf Kolkman
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Scott O Bradner
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Pete Resnick
- Re: PS Characterization Clarified Jari Arkko