RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem

"Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com> Tue, 10 February 2009 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2393A6BD4; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dr2v1XePDGQe; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail76.messagelabs.com (mail76.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 573F028C2BF; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:41:16 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-76.messagelabs.com!1234226477!63521776!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [148.139.13.5]
Received: (qmail 4351 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2009 00:41:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO SVBOSAPPDMZ1.wilmerhale.com) (148.139.13.5) by server-3.tower-76.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2009 00:41:18 -0000
Received: from SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com ([148.139.192.1]) by SVBOSAPPDMZ1.wilmerhale.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:41:15 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:41:16 -0500
Message-ID: <50E312B117033946BA23AA102C8134C6031B3C1F@SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com>
In-Reply-To: <200902092323.n19NNIPs006220@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
Thread-Index: AcmLDWdN6tyM2VgCRQmCxFIZuwRChwACsu2w
From: "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras@wilmerhale.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2009 00:41:15.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[477D74D0:01C98B18]
Cc: Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, SM <sm@resistor.net>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:41:23 -0000

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM
> To: Marshall Eubanks
> Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed 
> work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
> 
> > > NEW PROPOSED
> > >
> > >    c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations.  If a 
> Contributor
> > >       desires to limit the right to make modifications 
> and derivative
> 
> > s/desires/needs/
> 
> > I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed  
> > out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their  
> > judgement as to whether rights are available.
> 
> Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are
> talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the
> challenging case).  And "desires" is the wording that has been used
> here for a while. 
> 
> But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the
> motivations for needing to select this may vary.
> 
> How about "chooses"?
> 
> Thomas

"chooses" is fine with me