IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 09 January 2013 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F39521F84FD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 00:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hpMVYyf6EAyd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 00:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844DB21F86A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 00:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id gb23so1267882vcb.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:09:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YizRBeNAjl35w3wWDZ99foZBZC8/9hdOsMTBs3N/bcU=; b=Ov+N4md0/Nd0lwVnTK0WJWWgNCLugnsY3o6zadrZHxqmgAdbxfLhR3JKBE+EpCGRP7 KoueRrj/ywaGe1L2iDgocCIMAccJ9egPM8gd7b6ZGXlTru+AfSrhs43dz5KesH2XUMLz 8s8dNUCwyVvP6w6/9l+qtxafTAu8owH3/gKxSWwK9ZojFYNvVQogcoD0pMiGMIaVgkHs bJTTQlMKqE0bOaxV0QGvWDyR8MsuJbn4Dr0Z+V6sbA/gWS+1yt0nim9DOpi9WL7fByGv Yd61l6BOyXjMd7SNjvP+KxMT6xpP29NYnkqY/jKxBckiZx08h33cfXsaesQZGEeyG6pS yfAQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.70.46 with SMTP id j14mr76199898vdu.99.1357718968962; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.145.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 00:09:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3D453E57-252A-467C-B64A-6671C85FD4BB@softarmor.com>
References: <CADnDZ8_GgVeapUKefFMqOvwOo00X8_rFDWMR0vb-Zvu_p=yT3A@mail.gmail.com> <a062408a2cd10003cf574@10.0.1.3> <CADnDZ88BVr6wj_RTGh8bMEkUt-sobWuDH-v0wyHVabSETVHrkA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88PJ4yCNp+6TSBFYNn_QMOZM_BFB4p3nmFy4R3XeApYLQ@mail.gmail.com> <3D453E57-252A-467C-B64A-6671C85FD4BB@softarmor.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:09:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_B+e13hXSzX9rdCGZULYkpv_QAG6QcCGp_0XYs9h1ppg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:09:30 -0000

>might preference would be just to pick one, and
> provide a stick for hitting those who do it the other way.

I think that IESG is already using that stick :)

AB

On 1/9/13, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> but the question of
>>> error in process is; does the RFC lack communication requirement with
>>> the community?
>>>
>>
>> Sorry if not clear. I mean that as some participant are requesting a
>> scientific approach to struggling with 2119 (i.e. thread-subject),
>> does that mean in some RFCs the use or not use (i.e. we see that
>> participant use different approaches to follow the 2119) that it may
>> add communication confuse with some of community?
>>
>
> I'm absolutely certain that some of our community is confused about
> something related to this thread. Given the absence of information that
> would help in a decision, might preference would be just to pick one, and
> provide a stick for hitting those who do it the other way.
>
> --
> Dean
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email