Re: NomCom procedures revision

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 28 August 2015 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E291A8761 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlNi2FQSBDHO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE141A86E2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so1311432pac.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j20qhTW0ie3csLXGtYD09Gj3apCzXBADqQ6Q1rkOpqo=; b=M55JheawKnuD1EOik0c1k7lt+K9ZnxOz/4cS4jDJi9NLItA4jLcs6kdH7I5BVHAYLr QzyZHZFFesMp/2uyu6jfWeWBH4uaf3tnnLPyVjfyNl3s/RmMYjSveF52E8oc31TbQdVV IY+PnA4pIsyLYuTsSuJxPkq2nObdOqG65hMYy+6H/FyrUXWi5q+HG/pRnxFbILat3OOT KY7i6zzaxxF+czgUdD+nhqLJ49XZw8Wjp0B/hJgMXQSdl/DmvUhcfhiF8cq+XOMTuG7w vIlLRnAP7kBajc3RkhOqiklqZ0tDovL/Fc287dV9sb0HJ12f8L77blZzapSFU/8BCTof cmLg==
X-Received: by 10.69.27.68 with SMTP id je4mr18241880pbd.163.1440798179084; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.27.6.155] ([131.203.238.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id am4sm6747582pbd.58.2015.08.28.14.42.55 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: NomCom procedures revision
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAL0qLwYJzFZT=OgWqiiTw-n6mvb3PPusRtArmPs_d4_qpLfmpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <55E0D5E5.6030802@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 09:43:01 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYJzFZT=OgWqiiTw-n6mvb3PPusRtArmPs_d4_qpLfmpg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_PnHssVH1jwWb5kcDqOirb0q0To>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:43:00 -0000

On 25/08/2015 16:01, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Some months ago I started the work of editing a revision to the NomCom
> procedures (RFC7437bis).  We made progress on some points, but seem to have
> stalled on revising the requirements for qualifying to serve on NomCom.
> 
> The draft I have recently expired.  Is there any interest in taking another
> run at this now?  Alternatively, is it worth publishing what we did
> accomplish, and leaving that one point for a later attempt?

Since you ask, I continue to feel that the 3/5 rule is restrictive for people
who have limited travel possibilities but have significant IETF experience.
Maybe we could have another week on that question, and then go with what we
have (with Harald's tweaks)?

So...

"  Members of the IETF community must have attended at least three of
   the last five IETF meetings in order to volunteer."

One quick fix is to change it to "three of the last six" which would
allow for a whole year of no travel and would not be hard to administer.
Another would be to add an alternative qualification "or five of the last
ten" to allow for longer-term regular participants. Either way, I think
that attending 50% of meetings should be enough.

   Brian

> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/
> 
> -MSK
>