IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: term for 3rd RTG AD

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 30 December 2014 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B0E1A1AAA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdf0jeqJ2srn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E731A1A7E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id et14so19953654pad.15 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ZTiEhtWZl74ZLiu7noDPYDEaqs5ausflEeJDwDY9Fo=; b=VvVKI2boFsADmhjR3IiPKJtdIRcylOXOtoUndCk6Gfvtr/BnXBSNPptI15WMRyfNgu KJg5HrMXMxiRqmTNmqTx8CqJR7scnikjTXD4PuFXHOLU12dvcAeSrEVQFbzSDyzcU0Z3 4mdr+umIqXr1eXbXn49NFLv0Oli3dNM2h4BWwbjmlCGgwpf2mG8EadTqyr6V9cUQh8yi sEQolIK9cYwmWbZh+vqh2p6y46Wda/u95cA+mLJ4kvG07F7/kMNbVmCEaWOhdTlcG/6k Fk/z4j2kmrcwhk25HkAYEE8Ll0I+yOy4sgh7BghmaFIZRJjJM+TE/SNG04+3s8uao92r pKhQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.249.226 with SMTP id yx2mr101044526pac.112.1419967513125; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6747:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6747:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hs10sm39170205pdb.33.2014.12.30.11.25.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:25:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54A2FC1A.4070809@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 08:25:14 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <549DB615.90408@gmail.com> <20141226222726.GB27054@verdi> <24548.1419894559@sandelman.ca> <54A2027C.90000@gmail.com> <026801d0240c$c0f12120$42d36360$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <026801d0240c$c0f12120$42d36360$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_QorkQ90DDGSmmbSqSaUT37RDAw
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:25:15 -0000

On 30/12/2014 21:43, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> In what way is...
>>       The intent of this rule to ensure the review of approximately
>>       one-half of each of the IESG and IAB sitting members each year.
> ... a bug?

The bug is that the first sentence of the rule doesn't say "approximately"
or "on average". Nomcoms are not stupid and have never to my knowledge
attempted to review 7.5 positions, but the wording isn't quite right.

I will shut up, though, because 3777bis has already fixed this.

   Brian

> 7 or 8 out of 15 clearly fits "approximately".
> I'd say that 6 or 9 out of 15 is stretching "approximately" and is to be avoided where other circumstances allow, but it is not a disaster.
> 
> Adrian
> 
> .
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status