IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 15 July 2011 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35D21F863A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdvQ1XA95Kra for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD4021F856D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 389CF59D; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
References: <CAC4RtVBGgk74VMEty9u5Yq+DFy=oR5tOnbZ3R5x83Gyee6mRNw@mail.gmail.com> <29987.1310565058@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4E1DCA13.9030301@acm.org> <04AE56F0C4CE8168D1B38D59@PST.JCK.COM> <p0624066dca44df0ca50f@loud.pensive.org> <49A68144182BB270C11BC841@PST.JCK.COM>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:06:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <49A68144182BB270C11BC841@PST.JCK.COM> (John C. Klensin's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:39:17 -0400")
Message-ID: <sdlivza8hf.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:07:24 -0000

>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:39:17 -0400, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> said:

>> Ooh, I like this proposal.  We can also have noise-types for
>> exhortations to not print the email.

JCK> If one starts down that path, there is a real possibility for a
JCK> semantically-rich environment.  For example, consider a noise
JCK> type for flaming, repetitive, responses to a topic on the IETF
JCK> list.  One could also very efficiently reflect what I assume was
JCK> the intent of a recent observation on the list with
JCK> noise-type="hitler" :-(

Obviously we need to take a typical step back first and determine the
scope of the problem.  We need to commission a "requirements for noise"
ID first.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
SPARTA, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email