Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Sun, 18 December 2016 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B88D12963D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7aRDjd1MUSf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0550129546 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2604:2000:1382:81a2:d8cc:4da:dec5:f4b0] (unknown [IPv6:2604:2000:1382:81a2:d8cc:4da:dec5:f4b0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 564E4284AD8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <384e8fd1-76cf-e886-d992-ef70cd4f1462@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:02:15 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ECE2C774-7CCD-43BE-A9A3-24810EE7DEF0@dukhovni.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612151513060.15183@bofh.nohats.ca> <20161216202704.glz5vgu773gqqgvm@thunk.org> <20161216203905.GD13486@mournblade.imrryr.org> <01Q8KHVOKE2C011H9Q@mauve.mrochek.com> <m21sx6u8sb.wl-randy@psg.com> <6D2E8F8E-1B02-46EA-B202-D23E5385CFF5@gmail.com> <20161217151451.hx5co6mjqmi2jakg@thunk.org> <13749.1482005985@dooku.sandelman.ca> <fe75a2a0-6127-d29a-8259-a82ddbbc966f@gmail.com> <77efae9d-a550-af05-4194-809887f5cc9d@dcrocker.net> <20161218041544.jitn4ts5nxz2dpzy@thunk.org> <384e8fd1-76cf-e886-d992-ef70cd4f1462@dcrocker.net>
To: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_f5DvhIUTwuMbhABJydSkpL_JKI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:02:19 -0000

> On Dec 18, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
> I believe some mailing lists have adjusted to detection of DMARC (maybe just when p=reject?) for a given author by making author From: field changes /only/ for such authors.  They don't make changes when mail is from non-DMARC authors.

The "postfix-users" adjusted to avoid breaking DKIM upstream
signatures, well before DMARC, by avoiding making any changes
to the message body and (most) headers.

At the cost of not adding subject tags or message footers,
the list does not encounter any DMARC issues.  The only
message modification is addition of "List-" headers and
and a "Sender:" header.

Perhaps that's not a viable option for IETF lists. FWIW the
subject tags could be added by upstream authors as a matter
of courtesy.  Indeed ietf@ietf.org has no footers or subject
tags, and would be expected to not fail DMARC after forwarding.

-- 
	Viktor.