Re: Running code, take 2
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 December 2012 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDA421F8B75 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:12:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBibnYVVtqvu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB19E21F8B6D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y2so1843663lbk.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:12:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NYgsCGFKTeT5kSrJ2rZUJ+sVxxlT9p8eQFHLYLRkdhk=; b=DLaiA5H79AiJG7B0Z94JaoXXvI5qAaYi9Wz7m1iKDzKZVQUcM5j5zDBbQeA+4C1mNi U8MJgyralgA5hgNotWrMML7XozhB1krflW6F9DvygDX1HAvcDn9RyqRAq4kgqAmtEFhT 7Nsx1CAt9b4M4aFqnyt+H1VS5Nkdz/K+f5AkqXGIm7ct7/Lo1wv85mG6S2/ibEN3qx3F cYela7zCRxW4fsJ7syW39i21mJvyu/+AzC20W1VqVF0m/Ak+1ERLiJCApciMVQGBrFBF s3zFy97cx4zJ3pimy7/HnUq9MukHmA6nA/QOtTU91oa7l4XjO8RNawTa8bd09zRoByjz lK+A==
Received: by 10.112.23.233 with SMTP id p9mr1094727lbf.6.1355411520672; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.13] (85-250-110-45.bb.netvision.net.il. [85.250.110.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pw17sm776953lab.5.2012.12.13.07.11.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50C9F03A.5090506@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:11:54 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: Running code, take 2
References: <50C8DB78.3080905@gmail.com> <50C9DED7.8060604@tana.it> <006601cdd93c$6f9f7a00$4ede6e00$@olddog.co.uk> <50C9EBB3.5040901@gmail.com> <B73F381B-93E7-4158-B5C5-D1F88994E7DF@viagenie.ca> <50C9ED7B.2010009@gmail.com> <6404EADF-2DA7-42FF-B6DC-596B0163687B@viagenie.ca> <009401cdd944$02fe0da0$08fa28e0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <009401cdd944$02fe0da0$08fa28e0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, 'Alessandro Vesely' <vesely@tana.it>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:12:03 -0000
+1. Yaron On 12/13/2012 05:10 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > How about... > > Start with Yaron's proposal to include in the I-D. This is easy as a starting > point. Duplicate documentation in wiki may be useful and provide a place to > track text for inclusion in the next revision. > > When/if inclusion in the I-D gets messy, replace text in I-D with pointer to > wiki. > > When/if experiment looks like a success, replace all above with data tracker > tool and allow it to persist for RFCs. > > Adrian > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marc Blanchet [mailto:marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca] >> Sent: 13 December 2012 15:05 >> To: Yaron Sheffer >> Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk; ietf@ietf.org; 'Alessandro Vesely' >> Subject: Re: Running code, take 2 >> >> >> Le 2012-12-13 à 10:00, Yaron Sheffer a écrit : >> >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> I think it's critical that a person reading a draft (e.g. going to >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-blanchet-iab-internetoverport443-01) will > have a >> direct way to check out on the implementation status. >>> >>> This is trivial if it's a section in the document. It's simple if it's > linked from the >> Tools page. Otherwise, e.g. if you put it on the wiki, only IETF insiders will > be >> aware of it. >>> >> >> sure. Let me restart: >> - I like Adrian proposal: instead of in RFC, put it online within our site >> - but you wrote: requires implementation effort. >> - I replied: well, phase 1 (of put it online within our site) can be done with > almost >> zero implementation effort. phase 2 requires some work (I'd say not that big) > for >> implementation/tools. >> >> Regards, Marc. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Yaron >>> >>> On 12/13/2012 04:55 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote: >>>> >>>> Le 2012-12-13 à 09:52, Yaron Sheffer a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hi Adrian, >>>>> >>>>> I would suggest to start with my proposal, because it requires zero >> implementation effort. >>>> >>>> disagree. phase 1: use IETF wiki. phase 2: develop an widget within data >> tracker. >>>> >>>> Marc. >>>> >>>> >>>>> If this catches on, I see a lot of value in your proposal. >>>>> >>>>> Please also note that the "implementation status" section (according to my >> proposal) is not "frozen" when published as an RFC, rather it is deleted. RFCs > are >> forever, and I think a point-in-time implementation status is not appropriate > in an >> RFC. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Yaron >>>>> >>>>> On 12/13/2012 04:16 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>>>>> I'm interested in this idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, I note that an "implementation status" section of a document is >> frozen >>>>>> in time when a document goes to RFC. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder whether we could leverage our tools and do something similar to >> IPR >>>>>> disclosures. That is, provide a semi-formal web page where implementation >>>>>> details could be recorded and updated. These would then be searchable >> and linked >>>>>> to from the tools page for the I-D / RFC. >>>>>> >>>>>> They could record the document version that has been implemented, and >> also allow >>>>>> space for other notes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adrian (Just thinking aloud) >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>>>>>> Alessandro Vesely >>>>>>> Sent: 13 December 2012 13:58 >>>>>>> To: ietf@ietf.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Running code, take 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed 12/Dec/2012 20:31:04 +0100 Yaron Sheffer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have just published a draft that proposes an alternative to >>>>>>>> Stephen's "fast track". My proposal simply allows authors to document, >>>>>>>> in a semi-standard way, whatever implementations exist for their >>>>>>>> protocol, as well as their interoperability. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-running-code-00.txt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am looking forward to comments and discussion on this list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As an occasional I-D reader, I'd appreciate "Implementation Status" >>>>>>> sections, including IPR info. I don't think anything forbids to add >>>>>>> such sections, if the authors wish. I'd add a count of the number of >>>>>>> I-Ds that actually have it among the experiment's success criteria. >>>>>> >>>> >
- Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Alessandro Vesely
- RE: Running code, take 2 Adrian Farrel
- Re: Running code, take 2 Marc Blanchet
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Marc Blanchet
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Marc Blanchet
- RE: Running code, take 2 Adrian Farrel
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- RE: Running code, take 2 Adrian Farrel
- Re: Running code, take 2 Marc Blanchet
- Re: Running code, take 2 Loa Andersson
- Re: Running code, take 2 Marc Blanchet
- RE: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Ted Hardie
- Re: Running code, take 2 Loa Andersson
- Re: Running code, take 2 Melinda Shore
- Re: Running code, take 2 Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2 Melinda Shore
- Re: Running code, take 2 Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 John C Klensin
- Re: Running code, take 2 Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2 Melinda Shore
- Re: Running code, take 2 John C Klensin
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 t.p.
- Re: Running code, take 2 t.p.
- Re: Running code, take 2 Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2 Randy Bush
- Re: Running code, take 2 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Running code, take 2 Stephen Farrell
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- The notion of "fast tracking" drafts (was: Re: Ru… John C Klensin
- Re: Running code, take 2 John C Klensin
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts Stephen Farrell
- Re: Running code, take 2 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Running code, take 2 John C Klensin
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts Keith Moore
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts John C Klensin
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts Stephen Farrell
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts Keith Moore
- Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts Stephen Farrell