Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Wed, 24 February 2010 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582453A853E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:05:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dqpCe8zIoIpg for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA683A83FE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (ppp-67-124-90-197.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.124.90.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1OH7wru021346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:03 -0800
Message-ID: <4B855CEB.6040608@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:07:55 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
References: <874c02a21002231826y613b9f97ya83740ba240f7bf9@mail.gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D02C29D87@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <sdzl2yvgru.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <874c02a21002240835u7cf4bf60y510cbbc870727852@mail.gmail.com> <20100224165011.GF5166@thunk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100224165011.GF5166@thunk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/10447/Wed Feb 24 06:51:40 2010 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:03 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:05:57 -0000

On 2/24/2010 8:50 AM, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> If it were up to me, I'm not sure I'd want to bet the DNS
> infrastructure on whether or not patent lawyers with shark-skin
> briefcases want to make a mint by instigating a lawsuit.  As we've
> seen with the SCO lawsuit, even completely groundless legal disputes
> can take years and years, and the only winner is the lawyers.  And
> we've seen how much public key deployment was held back because of the
> RSA patents; and most people who have lived through those dark times
> really don't want to revisit them again.


right.

(shudder)

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net