IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 April 2021 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BA83A0F0E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1lFCeajET1H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CE13A0F04 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id cu16so18242196pjb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=nX8BGVb9KsLtl+K5ihX4XCsZIho8uqvQVs4pkaPpXpE=; b=UFoqb6SFBqubS72WKqiBLylaSW76zFbPzX10CDvmYJZDmhHZGLkcpjsNC9oeahyNhU 0B5hhwUp8qr8fVmCEcrSNd4J3gHMK+IzodKpSE1PsWANs8kU2jMbUQIVONjxrD9fA6oS //blrk+vyDwtZBAHi8sDs45CNDqzUTkwwZPKgtgqqPjKDkVhFasrQJ3xksus5dn5nsr5 mN6CHB/1TSgrKCC3+DUY0H0Ezk1oqzFSmfy59KmAJl/L814hoKM50+JJXKjNqDN4X7Xt 3IaLOMmOMfugVDjH0mpzG1mixMjUescIlHu0mgPActxoMUk/U2lcFJgx75ZlvS2RHXb8 VcRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=nX8BGVb9KsLtl+K5ihX4XCsZIho8uqvQVs4pkaPpXpE=; b=IkJLaJTFUhqwvFs9Imr89AmZqEbLEJJpMZWoGrhsr/9EHTwpUa35q5prvEVG9GPNIi PPH3qjVo7ISUcONCYtG/Avj67QmD4qTgbWovyYpp0tTk6x10xbeWEJehpUhG+WL97EDv ZkRwxDOo7uh9pGDtAm3lD5Q2m8jKBi4KHOEaHsOE0cJeucHAt0dP4hua4S1yiJ6hyMXP ijXPbm22muBMYuol3n1temFo38+5DtJV9lJTZMgSSwK251OBKTLLNzmdW4fNqGPsfnv6 Tec2wS+zdJ8GPB9FdIOsZV6ELq6mnyC2I1hM2CqGOTZyaSbG8V6/8npxhp4mCDMMtTlZ 9a5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WocLyjX1ZbSK446mAbldw5b0MP3BSkS1zBNe/JD6Mb033Ibna U5HOLBdJz/fmweWsQ3KS2vY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw86gNCFJ2LcYOvJfcjaEfFBAuv/P6FySTFG80fiGVljRYUCVA12+LM0RTZaHw62XgOoYgC7Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7043:b029:ec:939f:c9e5 with SMTP id h3-20020a1709027043b02900ec939fc9e5mr17079053plt.64.1618940947750; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:648:8200:dd20:e554:fbc8:fdc5:a434]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d21sm2908479pjx.24.2021.04.20.10.49.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
In-Reply-To: <001001d7360b$2384e0d0$6a8ea270$@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:49:06 -0700
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <CE831FEB-1AC8-486E-A4BD-BFA64DF38E71@gmail.com>
References: <001001d7360b$2384e0d0$6a8ea270$@acm.org>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E5199a)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_td7kzM25YwEddH206A_0fP4TTE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:49:15 -0000


> On Apr 20, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone think GitHub is perfect for IETF use already?

I do not. I’m not sure that a process or tool exists that can be described in those terms, including our present processes and tools.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email