Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802E33A0D32 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFwmHrlMAMpo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672AE3A0DB1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02QI3IBb024650; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:22:24 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=6IXdRxqPL5KQlMenpKW+pxCt+ZxK8CS0/IijqD1uTjw=; b=RSQjjMKb0f6YJBJ1A5iusRqYDJ/zmndhDdpon0Fm6zjx1OsIjUijWYA3Skb0oshomCov gjil9MLDRUM7wY2Xy3JeZfscESEvk4MSDYG7s4V+msqfTyXXeUgcHvOYuLpz1eN3H50a cy4tC/2+i/N0MsbIGuTEA/YCvcFEAT68mFrZ8o2Ge/cl01W6ydslHPSsP0DsLeYlY0NZ H7vpgeg/9OnRctH2VDB/Iakxb9msPtudTOgMmKz9HS05/64qmGurOQ/phsJxgKp3IaLZ 5hhQwBWcLAEYZ6ej2D2obVy8BtX32CMI8NGQ3kn58dNRkKUKPcbJbDDOkQJMe/HMGM1w VA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yyt9rgyen-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:22:24 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02QIHi8X008476; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:22:23 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ywgw8xefm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:22:22 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:22:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:22:22 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Topic: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Index: AQHV+T17YIte9GVOtUSJhAMBWIG3LKhaRrUA///IIwCAAWKlgP//y0WAgABGzgD//8DvgA==
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:22:21 +0000
Message-ID: <913852B5-110E-41AE-B716-D4C91F2F9DFD@akamai.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <55D8F3C6-7F2A-4382-AFFD-B8A1D7C14992@akamai.com> <28066.1585242203@localhost> <2118E3F9-03DE-4663-B648-7BC95AFEDFC1@akamai.com> <2d332d21-a4a4-d0d4-d8c4-8dde426d0f24@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <2d332d21-a4a4-d0d4-d8c4-8dde426d0f24@comcast.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <082F5D5960710A43BE6D90360A3BA1CB@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-26_10:2020-03-26, 2020-03-26 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=766 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003260136
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-26_10:2020-03-26, 2020-03-26 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=754 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003260135
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_uo3R37J07pzHJkLbVUuUMJL8lA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:24:40 -0000

>> 	People who signed the etherpad on more than one day get to count 107 in 3 of 5.
>you mean 3 of 6 I believe.

Nope.  I mean if someone attended multiple days of the virtual, then 107 counted and usual eligibility rules apply.
If someone didn't attend, then 107 didn't exist and the usual eligibility rules apply.
Hence the term, Heisenmeeting.

Whatever process is chosen, there should be a one-time mailing to all who qualify telling/reminding them that they are eligible.