Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers
jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 02 August 2012 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D7211E8163 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.223
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.223 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.376, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0-wLGrmWERa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E973E11E8133 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 0898618C124; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers
Message-Id: <20120802171424.0898618C124@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:14:24 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:14:25 -0000
> From: Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp> > Probably nothing can be perfect when defining "affiliation", but I > think some definition can help reducing hidden conflict of interests. I suspect that unless it is done very carefully, any more extensive definition is simply going to open additional potential loopholes, in the additional text. Just say something very non-specific "affiliation (interpreted as broadly as possible)", and leave it at that. Noel
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Samuel Weiler
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Donald Eastlake
- RE: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers SM
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Patrik Fältström
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Michael StJohns
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Samuel Weiler
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers t.p.
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Randy Bush
- Re: NomCom 2012-2013: Third Call for Volunteers Noel Chiappa