IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A34120019 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_oXemxWTyAy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED80120013 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id q21so12410997pfn.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/hCPSv4vrpuHh3upLRbi4e2v43k9VquD4Xf+GNRSVvU=; b=dWLJA6abjr85pzSnu7yDdVTMCCMC3dtTWNDNmJaCR3W16aM9TSTw2UIon5ec/3qWk6 OMOsjwFPAi913/fzaR19tO6AZFeKHYhXW2Zixs4Cp15TDAnTWY/KjR0GdfILVfvKSmkB QbqvWkUlv4IiCH3ds4g7uG3KIfr59wPOmRL97K95Eu9lS4fCLEBmyl6N0EvNmUyRPmzr YmS/32tatmG6GS4WBs3i++YuGVSi7Z2Yq96TPWOx8aDLhCj78r92udu7fBfWYzpgCtOF bPUqccWw/jRbEl3XGG32Kf27SoVCtjj//7R+UT9MFy6RioqUm3MWzdX6KaQ6PaPfPJKf D4pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/hCPSv4vrpuHh3upLRbi4e2v43k9VquD4Xf+GNRSVvU=; b=LzENqJBJoYDNdvwCMPqbyq8BrsMbcACmg3RhK7UpY4z4kQ9a2unoyXKgkjp5H5IKRh E/oPqB3rFeAU/mRa3skr8SIM1pOs81t2WwH3LOz/kpuKTScZ44JK1AS2tYZm0kooSOsm kBVPOhJFgO9lWqa4cj8Q1dU7V9MNKUynduRObp8JYnagJh/db68aO9dcnJ2G8e4nlmuM opOe+aTTZmxCLgKRlpsBFy0SeJ4WwmmzlRXvemS+W1jywAmdODtAMnpXqWoomyCvFLy0 jTIJExCPKnmNMLRynOSaH5W1LG3JED6J7qvuqtzRFcZGM0IxgKG5epK+7olpmGZe2LpA luYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXicNHGHryePv2XABT+gZrs+DFSBqzuDZE8+t218zcGlc6MgDbb V41Ldj+64kxi2kDks/4L44r6r228
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjFl84/Ignhxo+MT7agbfB8mIJ56C7NT25TSZ4BaJObJSpba7RDDfU5px/w3kj+X5BHwrCeA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a4d:: with SMTP id k13mr29528848pgm.174.1568156805382; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm14888274pga.52.2019.09.10.16.06.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgTqDTXgG1bU1DGBkdQ7XwV=2ryJzQU1QD8yNba-7ngk3A@mail.gmail.com> <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com> <CABcZeBNw8c17F0bvcSJoS4R=dk_KoSx1jWkEnupUUps6k8UcGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgS88fD7BkrE4T0A+S99xN-b4JZDm4yu2nLAb3oiG50S4g@mail.gmail.com> <368275E4-F9F9-4B35-A764-0709C875A7D1@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <31b877c4-df37-ddfa-3327-2631e6741afb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:06:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <368275E4-F9F9-4B35-A764-0709C875A7D1@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_xwiJoc2yqZpwihI5GZ0SUkA6Dw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:06:48 -0000

On 11-Sep-19 10:08, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>Even if one disagrees with the content of RFC 6635 (which we probably all do, in different ways), there are other, non-Informational documents that specify how to replace it with something that has community consensus.  And this ain’t it. 
> 
>  
> 
> Agree.  We have a process/mechanism. One of the worst things we could do is ignore it because “this time it’s different”

If it isn't already clear, I strongly disagree. When our self-imposed rules have proved to be problematic, ignoring them is exactly the right thing to do, unless it's illegal.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email