Re: General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of-area ADs)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3001A89EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKeRVepNQQzs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686321A89D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y13so27768446pdi.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ap8yNDahebBubjCHZGgstUi11CVxsAoiPd7iJyNkbW0=; b=dyfa5rZUZhkS1lCsea/mnQ4tewBKCXg6G565qhvcau3npoz7vel+hLF9Xx7EatwFO0 I3U7DXzmXRHCnjdSXGuKZq9q0zVZUaUeoMsZKJXGrxc51ACEN2V0lyagJv3EA3RnLB52 +dPckZfuPIa/tIzZVSP88qdbkmfxdOicN/Tr8rSx9oC2o6bYz5QUtcmZiB6g5Ezx/3bx xdxo2hzqVe6lzIq+DBD9+7I0y5RBkHcDe2Z3ciwbke+w6iw/j4TlAuc90fYXm7UietHi 9eJqj6MaIPb+xaPlobRJUhwU/dqtHRJf9JY9Ab6aHiFz0wv+PBQJq6Gcqi1oFqvk9lW2 mP8Q==
X-Received: by 10.70.88.231 with SMTP id bj7mr39898865pdb.168.1421026832586; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6af6:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6af6:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b11sm12777310pdl.56.2015.01.11.17.40.29 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54B3260C.7080208@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:40:28 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of-area ADs)
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <549DAE1C.5080400@gmail.com> <54A02C8A.3020707@qti.qualcomm.com> <54A04CDC.8020009@dcrocker.net> <54A05568.705@gmail.com> <20141228201401.GB24442@localhost> <20141228211335.GC51125@mx1.yitter.info> <2CBA73A8-3D5D-4B53-8420-8F3FC949FC6D@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <2CBA73A8-3D5D-4B53-8420-8F3FC949FC6D@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a348R61M5Bj-PCYD5sDLxKfLWbo>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:40:35 -0000

On 12/01/2015 13:46, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> Good points. Thanks for your mail.
> 
> I will just briefly note that the key question is of course whether one believes areas are generally useful from the point of view of people participating in IETF work, despite the fact that they will necessarily have somewhat imprecise and soft borders.

fwiw, I think the areas are very valuable as a way of organising the work.
That's why I find the proposed reorg hard to grok, because putting myself in
Jari's shoes, I cannot imagine how to steer the work of the steering group
in future. I do earnestly suggest that the IESG's mindset should be: this is
an experiment, and there will be no shame in unwinding the change in a few
months or a couple of years if it fails.

On the other hand, it is a very bad thing if the areas become silos and the
cause of them/us thinking. So this experiment has the virtue of shaking up
the silos.

> 
> One practical value that I have found both as a participant and as a manager of IETF work, is (most of the time) finding the people who are in charge of a particular topic. For instance, if there’s a routing issue I know which ADs I can turn to :-) And they know it. And the participants know it. There are of course counterexamples, mostly relating to those soft edges. YMMV whether you believe those outweigh the clarity in other cases.

Exactly - it's a tradeoff.

   Brian