IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 25 April 2019 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C00812033A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4OxBcgeZOIb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from firebrick.maple.relay.mailchannels.net (firebrick.maple.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.214.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAD5120074 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17208C220E; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:32:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-7-81.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.7.81]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8E398C2095; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a23.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:32:29 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Snatch-Wiry: 41c2f91564516322_1556213549342_3099185690
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1556213549342:198407421
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1556213549341
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCEA81CFD; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=dx1czBAXIm/vUp MmbNJ/g7Bjjbo=; b=lyuIgHeiixbFdPprgi/aOt987Cxm/SBIvX3t8SDRGkTyiO ZyeM5iPyHHWML3ozsSufM9lfDTHg6P5N5gYrQ7p2V5aZl7hx9kNBv/r+nE55E+VI uc+kT4PYJaP3lJlF4KHHbxEnEtmMUZOoISr75YbR1zowviIHzrri+hA0cjQbU=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4DC581D06; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:32:19 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a23
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Message-ID: <20190425173218.GV3137@localhost>
References: <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424095017.13cdadc8@elandnews.com> <51068F13-E90F-42A2-8AE2-627D5E18B145@akamai.com> <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424134823.0c9faf68@elandnews.com> <20190424211123.GO3137@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424144539.0cabcde0@elandnews.com> <20190424234334.GQ3137@localhost> <11F97591808485C30AD98A22@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11F97591808485C30AD98A22@PSB>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrheeggdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a84NUt5CpO670WGFbuMe2PFb3F0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:32:32 -0000

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 01:24:11PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> Nico,
> 
> Let me note two bits of history and then suggest that you (and
> others who have responded to the idea of reviewing and
> potentially approving this document by an Individual Submission
> process with the sort of righteous outrage that I read into your
> last comment/jest above) tone it down a bit. 

I think you may have misread my note.  There was no outrage.  My point
was that having to host a BoF due to no AD sponsoring the I-D is hardly
a serious problem.  The author seemed more upset than I thought should
be the case.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email