IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 26 February 2020 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B943C3A13A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:30:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H16izLTTFhEF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217C23A139D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C3638982 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:29:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9977968B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:30:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eDGSd+B=Taf8Q=AoE=_mHj542PT1ChvqO3485oVKSWtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <158258721017.24319.9082233711977122647.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAObRXJ=NnrxLAGgtas8Cs_jw-AJ0YsgYpMmYtrHy+PjKsfqvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh17iOi_8qZ7at8gHQ6R38YwVuUZ8O1cpsJU7MKh+nMmA@mail.gmail.com> <DBBPR03MB5415B842B32E90BF91D0C361EEEA0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAAuWHCKRhe-ct2tP5TqBaCn_fSTBoFSkrppTKOyhoP_xW6Ydag@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eDGSd+B=Taf8Q=AoE=_mHj542PT1ChvqO3485oVKSWtw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:30:15 -0500
Message-ID: <7732.1582749015@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a9i0Ufo4tlKo4bGU2Jle723w_AA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:30:19 -0000

{Please clean the CC list, in particular, CC ietf-announce doesn't work}

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Keeping in mind that none of us can speak for anyone else - I can
    > certainly fly to Vancouver and see who else shows up to talk, and no
    > one is going to make any of us show up against our will...

The problem that many companies have is that they can't be seen to be making
anyone go there against their will.  There are many subtle internal political
situations which would question whether people are making their own
decisions.

So this is why, I think, companies are forbidding travel.  That decision
invokes no subtle peer pressure, removes them from liability ("The company
sent me"...) etc.

    > I'm currently participating in an all-virtual meeting in another SDO,
    > and their e-mail server is running about 20 minutes behind direct mail
    > to participants, so nobody is quite sure what the current discussion
    > state is, depending on whether or not you're addressed directly in the
    > e-mail.

hahaha.

    > Canceling completely now is also an excellent way to find out that we
    > are nowhere near able to go Plan B full-online successfully. If someone
    > in this thread can speak authoritatively about how well prepared we
    > are, I'd love to hear from them. Until we hear from them ...

1) Our problem is that meetecho requires a base to operate from.
   A meeting room.  If we can accomodate that, then we can use it.

2) Webex officially does not support quite a number of desktop systems that are
   important to us (although they do work, but they don't support us).  Anyway,
   we have no SLA with the webex "donation".
   Webex does not seem to have an option to force people who join to join
   muted, although the chair/host can mute people who can't figure it out
   themselves.

3) Most of the other services which do run everywhere do not support larger
   groups of people.

{me: not crossing a border this time}

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email