Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 04 July 2010 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653D33A690A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqNt4LAxrjh9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB803A687F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.123] (c-67-189-76-178.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.189.76.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o64FMXTc086059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Jul 2010 15:22:34 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
References: <CFB08C07-DE90-47BE-ADFF-FC72162BBFA1@daedelus.com> <4C2BBD51.2060605@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701070804.0c26b8a0@resistor.net> <6D6E25E2-057B-4591-9288-1283036D0374@cisco.com> <20100701154421.GB43159@shinkuro.com> <4C2CE406.7090600@vigilsec.com> <20100701231916.768AA3A67EC@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTik6AuU5ZtrW5wGRNDlSrAP2EjURCKC3J_e_mJ93@mail.gmail.com> <5F56951F-FEB5-4A33-9B29-75313DDB58D4@telecomitalia.it> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1007031214070.1803@pita.cisco.com> <4627C38B-99A6-4265-87FD-3BE3B1EE5CD4@telecomitalia.it>
Message-Id: <675E3194-8EAD-4D71-8632-2389B6465F6B@bogus.com>
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Marocco Enrico <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
In-Reply-To: <4627C38B-99A6-4265-87FD-3BE3B1EE5CD4@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B367)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B367)
Subject: Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 08:22:28 -0700
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:22:37 -0000

We've had deployments where we've taken over the hotel's wireless Infrastructure and as result been expected to serve their customers as well... Doing so is more or less incompatible with authenticated network access. It imagine us doing that again sometime...

Joel

Joel's iPad

On Jul 4, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Marocco Enrico <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> wrote:

> That is understood, Andrew's comment I seconded was about the
> possibility of the change becoming permanent after Beijing.
> 
> --
> Ciao,
> Enrico
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jul 3, 2010, at 21:19, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Enrico,
>> 
>> Nobody has suggested there was anything wrong with the old (NUL)
>> access method nor that any damage has ever been caused, but that
>> is entirely orthogonal to the matter at hand. We are (in November)
>> going to a location where such access is "required" (at least it
>> seems a good idea from host's point of view), so we are testing
>> it in another location, Maastricht, first to iron out bugs etc.
>> 
>> Ole
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Marocco Enrico wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Also, if we really need to switch to a new access method, I would
>>> deeply appreciate if someone explained what was wrong with the old
>>> one, i.e. what damage was ever caused by an open IETF network. If
>>> any.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Ciao,
>>> Enrico
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>