IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting

Eric Heflin <ericheflin@gmail.com> Sun, 01 December 2019 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ericheflin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8522F1200B9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 10:07:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zLNzfIyr2mp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 10:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1A512004E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 10:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id a15so41299520wrf.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 10:07:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tb9ua7CC5zQB1o7ZKCCoRfqRYRHWKr5Xnf4Ki6t3D+0=; b=qVY51hcFMbT50MQXOquqAF8Mb2ZvbfpFWdFlWDcApaRILWBcxYoLdfx91P6LA6EwSK GubhR6XP0CQjrzyc2UbhOMyPf94C87SOSHXu6F94hrnYNH1+FJHoFgEV5vQ6REyK1UJu TI134RVlCWO/sepkJ5ESzi0ix0H8UWFediUA3rgonraqLvDkI1Gg7jSjoA/RLL8QfnGG SlHP2KB3cIAEZPEWg+BqKKWOG8z5yphqyL9mAEUPkP71QwIkYFHEwkvGKL29epv/5LNQ cPXjIztj99xi1kIiBiWwVnXEARKOGqIzmXFvCwu7SQBu4ARbc9WSQNZg6c5poCZCB4Ql p72w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tb9ua7CC5zQB1o7ZKCCoRfqRYRHWKr5Xnf4Ki6t3D+0=; b=cJz/Yeikg9uc7g9nY8pH99HbNKOl6yFNuMjTUEkxCPRWQvP2GL82tAAl0zwrhaQE5o FNL5JusU5CYbahmByBySKee6ia3UyUMnmnbjpFSguW/oQTlwhPiNwZa1TUNZYnMyLMTN t+WifCU9bcpkTOJDrNoaIdZ+C0bofVyg1djOkP51M3i8otcTzvxQJwA0ODgHsS4LreMp V5REEu+guGaJ0gPmI/OGFo2cpWAc/aAlNbGXTQ8vb0ecoVWqFH9WFr0IsQYJNMjh+UC9 AqOp04gnFVejBMW7iAmIfurbJ52q4LWK5FkxoOqa8m76bZS/ZYMZ0yCMzBT4b1zhLzyK j/Ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW2VvUao3EApqPC/FKd/3RfWgUuFBaG4A2VLZGvuqIJpd2dp2Xc pUvXIIPJwpn7SNOVr6zRbyevB06r0bxzqSz8tw8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyqPOln4Iu5EKQXkRa2h58nOeXKB/M/6D8SERqMFJkY9s5R5uYrwAlQ06LD3UZo+J8SYeSJBUG5q6dBPL6WXgs=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f885:: with SMTP id u5mr15333988wrp.359.1575223647684; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <86428447-b3d5-92b0-b404-2b94a5915385@foobar.org> <6EA0235C-BC0F-466D-8222-9F1C557421E1@network-heretics.com> <DE061B13-E6BB-43E5-B814-F44868A23CFF@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE061B13-E6BB-43E5-B814-F44868A23CFF@sobco.com>
From: Eric Heflin <ericheflin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:07:15 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOnLz-GS9aMPeaNXjAC09+sdybxYS5MvSWAX65FbdW-hD+mssg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f64caf0598a8553d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aH1LpHiKuB5THyjy8GGst467YUU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 18:07:31 -0000

Also agreed.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 11:56 AM Scott O. Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> > On Dec 1, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Dec 1, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd be happy for pagination to be the default if there were rough
> consensus that the primary medium for reading RFCs was printed paper.
> >
> > Seems like this is backwards.  Pagination should be removed from plain
> text RFCs only if there’s rough consensus that nobody prints RFCs anymore -
> not because a few individuals think that nobody should do that, or think
> that they’re in a position to dictate how RFCs are used.
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email