IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Enough DMARC whinging

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Fri, 02 May 2014 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DA01A09E9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaBsOcaGA4GQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B961A09CA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.39] (rrcs-67-53-121-163.west.biz.rr.com [67.53.121.163]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BABD22B1A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 04:28:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1399004939; bh=uxLp79bLjSgCqclydDAaA7hm540Z3BHmqYyWmlBaNNM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=NMFst7JOIL4HlUJ+7Ga3WK5ZfdrBLmDvdzuu4YcMPWvGIivydoKP7zmBWQUnHieOZ IGGTNb1RSW3pNGodgxfoNROs03ucs9Mfb+Iu6tN6iy7dT+z7qmqCCmFYuDVIr/Zp2g eRQq6W16nz/m1OgZ7lyR+/1CrMB246IOErbQkKvE=
Message-ID: <53631F0A.40602@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 21:28:58 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Enough DMARC whinging
References: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0i1Ppc-nMeWL-ipms4E4b0wpsSRZdLG+2YhujPgH-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com> <536113B1.5070309@bbiw.net> <CAMm+LwiXoW3p5uCmML4kAWXnbrrAnSCK9x5U2qeHJdVgR2r_Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU2uVtv84-P=aEBhvU_xyBo6LktnpcQuWmx18_e6FgyjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2uVtv84-P=aEBhvU_xyBo6LktnpcQuWmx18_e6FgyjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.7a1pre
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aKm9GVbOQNQQQhyVMZF9gzElsfU
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 04:29:02 -0000

On 05/01/2014 08:07 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> Phillip,
>
>     And to the other conversations, we are talking about draft- here. And
>     that isn't the same as standard. In fact one of the requirements for
>     being granted standard would be to come up with answers to these
>     issues.
>
>
> I could not agree with you more, EXCEPT in this case major service
> providers (Yahoo, AOL, etc.) are already treating it as a standard, have
> implemented it  ...

Rough consensus and running code.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email