IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Sun, 15 February 2015 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E1E1A1B89 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3slCLbhItO8V for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD761A1B88 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F86EDA01DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:43:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B650C53E07A; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:15 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzy=XHCWH63_-evMcJPXFr0BF9Xdkf1+NDdQQoyrRRy+9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:43:02 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <AB7481FF-09A2-4168-89FC-DDBE68F3F06F@nominum.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DBD71C.20101@joelhalpern.com> <26803.1423772214@sandelman.ca> <tsla90ikh85.fsf@mit.edu> <37661D4B-1842-4890-88FB-2A7B13CDC884@nominum.com> <CABmDk8m1KuSs8os9V7fcYOJC2O4yMb6dRFer+nEPBTTSHtey9Q@mail.gmail.com> <31891031-4628-49CD-B66C-38A3BD787B70@trammell.ch> <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <CABmDk8nKHZZ0HQqgTSB=qc9wEbUaSOSsdKYyNjRf2wGF-XsLvQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DFE555.3060809@cs.tcd.ie> <CAKHUCzy=XHCWH63_-evMcJPXFr0BF9Xdkf1+NDdQQoyrRRy+9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aKpO-jGtLFJyGuMAfG025-mF4h4>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carlos Vera Quintana <cveraq@gmail.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:43:18 -0000

On Feb 15, 2015, at 4:26 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
> Seriously, I've often wished that Cyrus Daboo (who sounds very like me; I've never met him) would read my questions and comments out; I'm sure that'd work better,

What would really help with this problem, and I think would actually result in better line discipline, would be if the chairs ran a queue of commenters and anybody, on-site or remote, could put themselves on the queue, but you couldn't talk if you weren't on the queue.   This would give off-site commenters parity with on-site commenters.  Meetecho already allows you to present with video, so I don't see why it couldn't allow participants to comment using video as well.   We'd want cameras at each mic line that are on when it's that person's turn to speak, so that off-site people could see them.

I don't think this is particularly hard to do if we decide to do it; the problem is that right now meetecho support, which is really great compared to what we had before, is still not really taken seriously enough.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email