IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Mon, 13 March 2017 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1592F1298AC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zhs2hJ99MYmj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A4D129406 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id D5F1C7A330D; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:47:07 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
Message-ID: <20170313194707.GF4095@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <20170301210033.1672.qmail@ary.lan> <C758AD84-F7DB-4520-A497-66CFBA8A48B1@tzi.org> <5e382acb-077c-87f3-7355-aa3bf913e78c@dcrocker.net> <EEAA5E62-DD3A-4D62-8E78-204C24859A73@tzi.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703131838100.54839@ary.local> <A8793F66-E860-4CC1-80F8-D3C0B430C6AE@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <A8793F66-E860-4CC1-80F8-D3C0B430C6AE@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aMxRTa0T6m67b2LCwVAO5n1ID5w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:47:10 -0000

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:14:12PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:

> On 13 Mar 2017, at 18:43, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> > You can complain about how stupid they are or you can upgrade your mail
> > system to use authentication methods that have been IETF standards for a
> > decade and get your mail delivered.  Your choice.
> 
> The most likely outcome is that local admins will �upgrade" our mail system
> by turning off IPv6.  (We have had IPv6 deployed for some 18 years now.)

That's my approach at present:

    $ postconf -Mf smtp/unix
    smtp       unix  -       -       y       -       -     smtp
	-o inet_protocols=ipv4

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email