Re: IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 17 December 2019 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5547120946; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwAxXxz1nPcj; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C12120044; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id z12so6946909iln.11; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xI6qVuJY9OcmspWlzVbTOad3uZqDiXPTT+bYQWvX4Gk=; b=NnsxCaY1gKnsOM5XK/IolO5NkBQA4gUqfvQQcITZkJxtHWS7V0Tm476gR8QH1ONz0Q qKvvpsehFNpVNDsvkoGYQmWzQykJcKXxyUMCL4KIiXs9VopaVDsS08uz16EvYfgXKGTT ruCjySqgmmEGaPJIhlczAbAcP4NrLEPg3rD5UulxkOeUToLNTT0HBr5v67yogVBkr/fB DNF8Ba/tzTfdwfNrXMzYbmgzU8Hw6gNVSkdWF8lJTX+C6TnCrZeT23F6MOKB2NcvnuoU J3+LVcVUeScfs2DCGmuHiwN72dP8c0vHBqKncLDzjdOIas0EEOUTi5rI+wHPGjhzDvBk RHTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xI6qVuJY9OcmspWlzVbTOad3uZqDiXPTT+bYQWvX4Gk=; b=ANZXrP98ugPpSHFWYQZpLm+UhXfmFx95wirsFzjatkIxQTrX3O40W+oW4zVGzpPDG6 BbvGWcBbxJwQ2JUzzX2bTtC+G5KwtWDEYVI7SIa60FVQJoGkPLTi/lPHX0alYzsenn2v klt5/iz7rpqIZhpHVgEzhFnc1Nn8q3x/5mrSeqq0LgAdVs++8zfIlleIK8z8920vTpy5 F1OCUvoKtkZ88f7dCCY6D8+LT/eK2nbTp5+tromWCJh1k6ygxODnroekSGm3dSpXAmJU Rm9ua4oiJPGNFoTbTIyvzKXG4QAvJ7riwXn1mdQTsKRpGSKPJGTm3Oes6Q8gSoOgNBu5 U8JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUYPOsse6Qi4gLLDxrfWN0TyC58qOIIheQ1kea91i255xrkH43h KzwHeNR1bBQSTDl0Co2SwDR/xUcSvYcYkdhqdGdRYFYHrkI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybmsqIsUJ+9UCatG4TirfK0txrWynit+ZAKXwdR/GTWZhNxLYIvEuAYFEq31fn2WirGwCIX4j4yPSzPazBeZ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1553:: with SMTP id v80mr15359751ilk.49.1576543429579; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8EE11B75E1F8A7E7105A1573@PSB> <m2a77ttff6.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABL0ig4Wz-0dk7bsRpaN6pni2rHEc-jPnygwed_Hygy+CiehQA@mail.gmail.com> <16306b3a-63bd-621e-636c-dd7626f74733@foobar.org> <DBADBA1F-5F81-4D14-8AF8-5F340F017DAC@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DBADBA1F-5F81-4D14-8AF8-5F340F017DAC@ietf.org>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:43:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sx5YH0-aUh1DzR-n-ciTwSq-A8km1SNcbZwuB_-ORc53g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Policy on dogfood consumption or avoidance - SMTP version
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000017de580599db9f63"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aY6mZaHwbWnmU47IISTRX23VplY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:43:53 -0000

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:47 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>  we have only received one complaint in 10 years
>

...by that measure, it performs better than most IETF functions.

This seems like a non-issue to me.

thanks,
Rob