IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: "professional" in an IETF context

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 31 October 2021 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E563A0940 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcLg59k5qAjf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE703A0926 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21525C0052; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:12:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:12:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=wVEx0SXYq4uJXqA4Q+tSAIHcBQSa2uFGpVfeASnBL k0=; b=F6oNfLGxrlvbEG7Ske8cjUhT6lQKw+V9ZKGFPkzlKoUMPsypK5bS2gk4y yua33Jqq8kgWMWl1SCgDnu+LveKQvf2cklR3iIs0WiRfkCsJgFOPJfCdFcoPNpUy qI6r31ZDtYdPVXNfX1uK0Ax1mBnyBMIOIT2dQXasZxlDX5LfLTyoExnB/X6e4cj/ JedWC5B/FI++TRUQxqFmEVfCHP/CsOJ1aV2VvhV4klvRjxpezbaxEhxX5s5bX6B8 lOaUh1nZiPXZafrUwANLxHCUUNzIbGeKAxov56vF0+r8v3WiWIS4urAV3/fd39LW 32cevpNoRCRjiqVPQoDh+LAm4k0WA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:uAZ_YUduiBRYYpqqolqjf4EhREvZH99q-_pI-NaC10zD6P-Cl1VC-w> <xme:uAZ_YWPalNSTcbIT-e-lmS60w56X5bezXUicI40-2d3RH3yFgQ3XhR2kRrzA5iIqk gn30KoYY85MuQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:uAZ_YVhGOmTEucGCPvyHahWB_FMI5ZHPJ5ZWzITlrhdrWuNhl91-EtxrOlWoiSpiPnqYfycxGr4x8yyzVJMyqJ_OBe9bgS36pKE2lYi1VVyC4HXFuvwMng>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdehtddgudegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghi thhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfefgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeek feelleeuieffteefueduueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:uAZ_YZ9vBnZZ6D8zLJMOlqwWFJv4oPgvA0uwKHAGBg1jhWF9KoaYvA> <xmx:uAZ_YQsl3g2fJw7qIV1TSBJUhEtKcxC7FyIlsc3EikmQJWjWb5icBA> <xmx:uAZ_YQFE6K3gouFcerZM7n4z1hvJXt1XTXJLABReJBmKmMNS_F8C7A> <xmx:uAZ_YZ7W5leSBv2K0Al7Iqv1Gg3lz4dHCEr1ZiOB0NuxHRqQ8UDA4g>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:12:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: "professional" in an IETF context
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk> <746C1453-FFB0-46E5-ABF2-8630DC23B959@network-heretics.com> <c3e9fe1b-8e48-a364-9e25-4084dac70889@meetinghouse.net> <3a6bf8ad-5492-0942-a451-6317e8a93705@network-heretics.com> <59c1102c-621c-f454-1265-06285c44ffe0@gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <e668891e-6426-83c8-3900-558e29469b7a@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:12:23 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59c1102c-621c-f454-1265-06285c44ffe0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aZa2035OA616-ekU9idLzIHQKgs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 21:12:32 -0000

On 10/31/21 3:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I repeat my suggestion that s/unprofessional/uncivil/ would fix the 
> document under discussion. 

Perhaps it would.   And all other things being equal, a simpler fix is 
attractive.  But I don't know why others seem to insist on "professional".

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email