Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453E2120233 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:18:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbVEHfHCJUGo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:18:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3eur04olkn0826.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0c::826]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC561200D6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:18:18 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CjWWoxMMIEpi8gL+poUZucThmMZVpPJBX+35vVnF+ku+T6gPydBEjgY8z8xmQRmfL0sFdyH12kL8zZrBpwM4vL+/YXjp4FhViS4J/XCUHSrHdZ0GzuvtEUFFduQSVYACTgKyCbVITfWzJ4yLCZ+CT1uyPHYsKwxCykcG08MAUgSqmlGGWmAR9sVO5Ox1b3HOrF5Nx2fa0DMKWKRD+udFbhyJRdhNIrZJjXk8wfxza2ai/a4KhnOIPxVyEeDax6HXM/9zj+VLOyXiVl5wSpzTuQRCMhWzYLPCiL9bprbqVT9bGcRuc4xHPb+JDHgUreU5Kq/sJm2l7yt0gyIdd6JR7A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HiDxiju4egopr/QgiH0DFq2EwavTlkv65p3LTQDGmtw=; b=aKXUt7znqXttGVMUlzi0S1osn6C6KzSw5vzaiwRvB4OJCBg6h4P6G2xNu9IX7jy0kova09TKiWvgVjzAncp6sgx8v7z9EQ0Rdu+1JtYNUhBB4ADfBHh57uuvdoVUIlosAw7lPMhO1Ej4NCnid4EPREf8Zk/TN6jb3pYAhffQS1bR2w5PrVJjb4XSPCSLgy+zvmggwvlafT0enX6AADqeWlsOMEuYMb5heEjx7kIxNSePpT+avPkSHekam6SsSBEyHcqSnA7xxQK0bwpCRnQeZ4FBDUwDWEYUhGQszMedM6Ov15xqESrzoNe/F7MtHQU/B054jmLHTR8ldrgjVcgFHw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HiDxiju4egopr/QgiH0DFq2EwavTlkv65p3LTQDGmtw=; b=rPUzcfogEuGWAyroyH/lKMwmo3Y7KBo/MoUArdWtyHdnv/7U0X2kt9TOTrmHrOUPWIiHKiRImYsP39sGnuH20G3S2Hly3jXkaz703I3R9OkFQqjkaZVsxjoAtdJdvW6UyYRZW+zyzMA0r++tc+nToM5fZJsdCXOAdGn07hu4SyYjtC7ajx26nS3kZsw5aGTTzxyM0aVaCoBUAzScwxaYRJDps33gSxQMW7pjNwGEUgdANhOWYUJDowBx2UL9YdGCZ1kM1zFd0LI8kdKRjxdd9tYj63pgtYPZRRVs2Oz5dFUmUI8mfpk28pyRaLrF7uNraDkhkC9zAqKQSAK1k113zA==
Received: from DB3EUR04FT060.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.24.51) by DB3EUR04HT160.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.25.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:18:16 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.24.53) by DB3EUR04FT060.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.24.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:18:16 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3]) by PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.033; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:18:16 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Topic: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Index: AdXnL4CMqKHMj241QNOLcaD05q7rXAAIGzuAAADiyrAAC1bnAAAA5wmbAAEvBgAAADeJpQ==
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:18:16 +0000
Message-ID: <PR3P194MB0843067E971FA61EB847821CAE130@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EDAE6375-EE0B-4864-9834-C1FBC209D581@sobco.com> <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <8ADEA0E1-291A-4400-9925-F65A26116372@consulintel.es> <PR3P194MB0843939F3B38426960A66E70AE130@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <B2462363-8137-4788-9454-74DA40B12F61@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <B2462363-8137-4788-9454-74DA40B12F61@consulintel.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:DF126B3168E851F301B5E36BFDFF627434B9C576923D7FC1E35D43A539C05BC1; UpperCasedChecksum:2485F113FD6C62E4CBA580ABFB3EE71CA5CB1E98D5AE6198BCE10541FFEC539D; SizeAsReceived:7240; Count:44
x-tmn: [D8ekJyipVPdaRI5JNzdS2eZz7OfL69S8]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e6c3451c-7af0-4f98-353e-08d7b5a2c3a6
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3EUR04HT160:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: L/v8dDnDtbfNbnWkqBSowS/VKyznA5kruMhnf49qjFMzxDjxfni1Dxg1wDfa/cRJAKyrNo+eQs3bnPiizR0J3uybkvIE/mu8UrXK8ZfyTBBfj++1tkCSiD+KC8NcH7+qFgJJBxxa4ncyfS+V2ASrx8LER1mgI/ByNvG4N7lyDOf6ylfYrHKW9pq6QjLW6cxxBurd5zmRZ75JtGxygAHkMFWK8MtX2wtKKx0W3B24LP4=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: YViCjvXNPNgU3FZCxgbEMjAlk7TEd/9e3UNn7mKa/DY6t1t1486OdQ9voPuGbMFdbxQs1xt2avBRAaaluqrKTQsPVWADOOpCEE4hFyt0mlB7Cgm3Fetwy60sHErQOmwbS4rNq9vuSYaaUF7e2GJRxA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_PR3P194MB0843067E971FA61EB847821CAE130PR3P194MB0843EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e6c3451c-7af0-4f98-353e-08d7b5a2c3a6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Feb 2020 01:18:16.7416 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3EUR04HT160
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aeE7ITnxxPrAp7oMAuHjtejDYjA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:18:24 -0000

I don't agree with this, transition means to move from something to another thing, the end result is full migration.

Coexistence is a matter of time until full migration occurs, but as we don't know how long this will take, we must find a solution to let them coexist peacfully, as we cannot force people to move to IPv6, just to increase their awareness, and they have the right to accept or refuse, regarding IPv10, i think it didn't take the claimed opportunity either in the meeting or the mailing list, what i expected is to discuss it fairly, listen to the good voices, and then check the consensus, if yes, lets make it, if no, do we have another alternative, if yes, bye IPv10, if no, then lets make the best format of it and apply.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 3:00:42 AM
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.


There is no such migration, it is transition and coexistence, and if you think in how much took to reach the actual IPv4 levels of penetration, it still makes sense. We are in the right path.



Anything else that we could try, will mean wasting more time and resources and money from those that already moved to IPv6 or are in their way, that we don’t have.



Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet







El 20/2/20 11:33, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com<mailto:eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>> escribió:



Regardless the different %s, lets take the average one, it can not make us optimistic and stop thinking about a better solution, we should learn from the long time passed without full migration occured, if we will wait till that happens, the division will occur which is not good for the internet, lets welcome new ideas and give it the space, time, and opportunity fairly, if it will be good then welcome, if not, trash is made for this.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>



________________________________

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 2:00:58 AM
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.



And you're missing several points about how those stats are looked at.

The % in the stats shown by google/others is only what they can measure, but they can't measure *all*. There are countries (big ones) that don't allow measurements, or at least the same level of details, and however, are doing massive IPv6 deployments.

All the CDNs and caches have IPv6. The customers that have those caches and enable IPv6 for their subscribers, are getting ranges over 65%, sometimes even up to 85-90% of IPv6 traffic when mainly the subscribers are householders instead of big enterprises.

Also, the google (and others) measurements, show average worldwide, but if you look to many countries they have even surpassed the 50% or so.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet



El 20/2/20 5:38, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> escribió:

    Since long time I was observing this, still almost the same, no clear progress occurred.

    Thanks,

    Khaled Omar

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott O. Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:11 PM
    To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
    Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
    Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

    Quite a few folk are already there - see https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

    Scott





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.