Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 09 December 2009 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4198A28C133 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:57:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.354, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xw2MomC+UCiL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (hardaker-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::af]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5148928C136 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ED1B982D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:57:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
Organization: Sparta
References: <4B1E5330.4060805@htt-consult.com> <4B1E870C.6090407@dcrocker.net> <4B1E89D4.10705@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:57:31 -0800
In-Reply-To: <4B1E89D4.10705@piuha.net> (Jari Arkko's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:16:04 +0200")
Message-ID: <sd1vj4nnro.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:31:10 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:57:44 -0000
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:16:04 +0200, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> said: JA> But its good that Bob's IT person has promised to figure this out. The JA> filters seem simply too sensitive. I have not heard of other people JA> having a similar issue, at least not beyond an extent experienced for JA> all autogenerated e-mail (travel reservations etc). That's all well and good if all you're concerned about is the posting verification message from the automated servers. But consider the fact that: half the purpose of posting an ID is to get comments about it sent to you. Consider then that if you have any sort of aggressive filtering in place that's blocking your receipt of the verification messages then the chances are very very high that you'll also block comments from some random person out there that happens to look questionable to your companies blocking algorithms. I've found large numbers of companies, for example, that assume that all their traffic is internal to their particular company and start running spam assassin with very high scores against mail arriving from outside their local bubble. This doesn't work well with comments about an IETF document. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions
- Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Joe Abley
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Russ Housley
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Dave CROCKER
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Jari Arkko
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Dave CROCKER
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Wes Hardaker
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Julian Reschke
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Dave CROCKER
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Julian Reschke
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Wes Hardaker
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Doug Ewell
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Julian Reschke
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Randy Presuhn
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Loa Andersson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Steven Bellovin
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Dave Cridland
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Dave Cridland
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Jari Arkko
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF e… Phillip Hallam-Baker