Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Thu, 09 August 2012 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D62E21F875E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSx5SzGduskU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A5821F8759 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so112596wgb.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=88KCLUG/6W3PSAhp4k9+6wBKR8Z8X5gkmNcCYZH8Ab0=; b=FUzc0MbK0/PidnN1e6i5CMicWQLgqZdgIL5KCtNtxekqpg9uKppOzh7ByesSzAKtVr ZQS16jsCNlJqjO+do+qzc/9g9vGRp90Cj8/FOtUHyhW2aSpgfDJWVRlvnmiAZJba7Ajx gpqb5TQPuPTw7PynwcRzJxmNqSPPpWYnVgDgg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=88KCLUG/6W3PSAhp4k9+6wBKR8Z8X5gkmNcCYZH8Ab0=; b=jbE5+7WKHhBA/136UdR+hN2pvAM27BD6Av3Ap9jagK68LQB7RF4rewZgFvo2bZB6WI fs4QHSk5uPn4uR653GVUvCWxcOqRO1ghAvW2bVPIaKlZbFM2Wo1pn5CXt2FE082oKI7h JxCxKVcFYQZjjoa5s6c9zw/TVL7LDbwbfE25ftPwVDvJJm3S6dWED6c0o25ubf+OBZNh tMJggyECsbecbjEIDX5hA2EBQT6Qe4RvlewiIrDg79xeXZUAE3y10vAwVMIpuIUZuhpW iPxsCNZCF/TI87jSSkp2cdNP1qRg0jQ0eUbaaz+pJlg0BS3wXs9ca0fS6qmV8EHwMyrC ES8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.106.97 with SMTP id gt1mr903023wib.5.1344500870208; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.66 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.66 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <006701cd7606$17ff48a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <CALaySJKV96tdXhzfPD1e1Mro_+gp5aDarF7Z06QrA+iQtnHkLw@mail.gmail.com> <501A5656.2050407@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <501BEC0D.1060404@tana.it> <009101cd7476$bb522c20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <599B1629-543A-49BC-A0E7-FA2096C538AD@checkpoint.com> <03e701cd749f$73891c40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <50229D32.8000605@tana.it> <006701cd7606$17ff48a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:27:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzzsf6veDR+uwxnMw4Koh0Kj7FqoQpsUbENMb_r3v0G89A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04428066c4dd9304c6d1003a"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmrz3cD+0KF0CJkEv4+dERhysdQbGgjIuBikYWxwEyE4k7AR7jC2LAXe+bkBUeDHOXK0fLI
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:27:52 -0000

Does anyone other than historians honestly care what the original was? I
mean, really?

Dave.