Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Tue, 10 February 2009 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D6428C1C1 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOr8rdpkAAzd for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868F528C0DF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 54259 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2009 21:07:24 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2009 21:07:24 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0902; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=NoBTGxzKCX37YLI/jMqy1WFG2x6Vm9U4Oe5ZsGh8yvI=; b=FPQeX/xBn7qD/aoC083pLEJbEGb0yWueMkqBaVWTrHlt5vBQlTY9V8TaY3uhRVblQCEwJIHEPXqbVUawCFnUWePJTed1pRodsZH/OEiY/caOoi3HrlYYSpvQIXhYjndDQBgj3Zr/QMOAQxbYRIPzTpSL3+fNlN2jw+BpMgiBl9A=
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:07:23 -0000
Message-ID: <20090210210723.63660.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
In-Reply-To: <20090210171217.GA6465@cisco.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:07:22 -0000

> I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
> all interactions?

In Dean's case, yes.

There's a great deal of history here.

R's,
John