Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Sun, 22 July 2012 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496E621F85CC; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.941, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJoRquHEZ4YU; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED94921F859B; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so4404971vcb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IaJ1A4lEFT4QHdDoBoWq58I5TLfm4lplc7qjRcAFtb8=; b=BQ1aIGp+0IlQMC2nPEfsCUvSsJLlKZMcrUywhtsP1HwJdjX35ai6C5iv8JDMz2Kxmi rTgcB1WqqiPYuOrw4utSu1jfT6kdytmA1nfB3dBSkQV5nLhbjfg6UlqXp8oKvPkM9+ZO 7vslKBva24DwEdXBET7GidBSi5INTBPPV/Z2wwmKPWBFASFHkW554zzDFJKqjHT+Dvlh /oMjqWkw7paKHzZJf7sXxnrylOY7Ql0+EvLTM07kX+TbNQ39lziyTFG/r4oizbOOxspX C9yXAg5/Utm+ecU7dA754UI+as7OkZSgMFJcwvUi4YDjweiy3nAlw8kj5Sq19u2N9VxO lUtw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.240.178 with SMTP id wb18mr8568739vdc.100.1342968897511; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.116.233 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1657B5B7-4680-4E32-991F-10BC70A84347@bbn.com>
References: <20120720130733.14364.19024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A29A24B6-4A07-46CC-902B-8A181F0541A3@kumari.net> <9B2F2766-DB92-4B7B-88DC-1B90FF6707B7@bbn.com> <CAPv4CP-zy1uUqXfXqNH9R1C-NTe+11pxgJ5ceZaR1=oU2E1T=A@mail.gmail.com> <A4AF7C0C-B8FB-47CB-BF36-78F2686FA5E1@harvard.edu> <1657B5B7-4680-4E32-991F-10BC70A84347@bbn.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:54:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwjv_x3qKW7xLQHpo24WQURrDqva2od+s1PmgxMW61t33A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iaoc@ietf.org, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>, iab@iab.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:53:57 -0000

In theory yes, a signed document would be sufficient.

In practice it would then require an expert witness at $400/hr to
explain that it meant it was authentic.

The schedule of fees seems a reasonable response to a real cost being
imposed on the organization.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:
> [assuming you mean the "go look it up" idea]
>
> We have the technology.  Surely a CMS signed object (or even just an HTTPS download) would provide adequate authentication that it came from the IETF.  And it doesn't seem like we would have a problem providing authenticated documents to the world.
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Bradner, Scott wrote:
>
>> great idea - just does not jive with the legal system which often need authenticated
>> copies of documents
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
>>
>>>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:07 AM, IETF Administrative Director wrote:
>>>>> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found
>>>>> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html>
>>>
>>> Fine idea.
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/