Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Victor Kuarsingh <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:37 PM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> While we are sorting this out, and whether we publish an Internet
> draft or not, I would like to know this:
>
> As I (Barry, not the IESG as a whole) currently read the rough
> consensus, considering what people have said the reasons you all have
> given, and the discussion of those reasons, I see things falling
> toward option 1.  Specifically, looking at RFC 8713, Section 4.14, FOR
> THIS NOMCOM CYCLE ONLY and SETTING NO PRECEDENT, I would replace the
> first two paragraphs this way:
>
>    Members of the IETF community must have attended at least three of
>    the last five in-person IETF meetings in order to volunteer.
>
>    The five meetings are the five most recent in-person meetings that
>    ended prior to the date on which the solicitation for NomCom
>    volunteers was submitted for distribution to the IETF community.
>    For the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee those five meetings are
>    IETFs 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106.
>
> The question I will ask is this: Is there anyone who *can't live with
> that outcome*?
>

Yes, I can live with this outcome.  It allows the organization to get down
to business and keeps the intent of the documented process sufficient
enough (under the circumstances).

regards,

Victor K


>