Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 29 November 2012 23:41 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2490E21F8B34 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:41:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1S7WzrDTxxSC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D0621F8B31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:41:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1354231553; x=1385767553; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/+06sti7ruklQd2CR8wHdVz8bw7OZMTJoI+XK7mEaII=; b=r9/9E32OWJZZWS7ooHqa5baZFF6K98t/0igWYYvTVvQjghTlPj5zAyeu OOFPaFK8gb3ihOH51CdEuoVaiPw/H0WX+xfYSDyqfwly2aKRxLi2z3hSN g30zdW30RZ4Q0UlrA3OBbeJZg0pECXDRrKaZT22qF7/T1x05V3tvAhEAx Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6911"; a="9752795"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2012 15:25:52 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6911"; a="434978330"
Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 29 Nov 2012 15:41:48 -0800
Received: from presnick-mac.local (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:41:48 -0800
Message-ID: <50B7F2BA.9000600@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:41:46 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
References: <20121129205534.8983.43593.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7C5BEF8A-70E1-4E96-BC5C-7D2D43E09A58@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <7C5BEF8A-70E1-4E96-BC5C-7D2D43E09A58@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:41:50 -0000
Like Randy, I am completely agnostic on the question of dividing the registries vs. adding an attribute to the registries to distinguish between reservations and other special uses. But one comment on the other item in your message: On 11/29/12 4:26 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > I also disagree with the approach to publish the intended contents of this special purpose registry as an RFC ans the registry itself is the intended mode of authoritatively describing those resources that have been assigned for special purposes. Obviously any RFC will age out and drift away from the registry, and the need to constantly publish updating RFCs to ensure that the latest RFC is reasonably close to the registry contents seems to me to be counter-productive at best. > I think (hope) you've misinterpreted this. The document serves two purposes: To define the registries (section 2.1, which is really the BCPish part of this document) and to populate the registries with initial values (sections 2.2 and 2.3). 2.1 is the real content of the documentthat will live on, get updated, etc., whereas 2.2 and 2.3 are probably better as an appendix, and I don't think there's any expectation that those sections ought to be kept up to date with future RFCs to match the registry. (Indeed, it might be nice if 2.2 and 2.3 were removed before publication, but that's not been our practice.) Does that allay your concern? For the authors, one thing I did notice in section 2: IANA will update the aforementioned registries as requested in the "IANA Considerations" section of an IESG-reviewed document. The " IANA Considerations" section must include all of the information specified in Section 2.1 of this document. It would probably be better to use the specific 5226 language of "IETF Review", "IESG Approval" or "Standards Action" (whichever you really mean) instead of "an IESG-reviewed document". pr -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Geoff Huston
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Geoff Huston
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Randy Bush
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Pete Resnick
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Geoff Huston
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Ronald Bonica
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Geoff Huston
- draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt Randy Bush
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Ronald Bonica
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Geoff Huston
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Pete Resnick
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Pete Resnick
- Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt John C Klensin
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… Ronald Bonica
- RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt Ronald Bonica
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.t… SM
- RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt Ronald Bonica
- Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt Randy Bush